Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:24:36 +0200
- Message-id: <200903260824.38777.peter_e@gmx.net> <text/plain>
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 23:55:06 Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> That was 6 months ago. I doubt anyone remembers it. Make another
> >> announcement, so that when people get the "unsubscribed" announcement,
> >> they're not confused.
> >
> > Done.
>
> BTW, what was the reason we didn't pull the trigger before, when we
> retired the other lists? Just an oversight?
Because the same people who complained just now complained back then as well.
So we retired the lists without objections first.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index