Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
- From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
- Cc: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Message-id: <200809230113.m8N1DY809327@momjian.us> <text/plain>
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:42 -0700, Guido Barosio wrote: > > Binary package from www.postgresql.org 121 33.799% > > We have 2000+ users in yum repository ;) These changes have _got_ to be increasing adoption; I only wish we had made non-source downloads easier earlier. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
- References:
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
- From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
- Prev by Date: Re: Who is updating the PostgreSQL home page?
- Next by Date: Bad link for win32/latest
- Previous by thread: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
- Next by thread: Question about event applicability...
- Indexes: