Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: Huh? What is this?


  • From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
  • To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
  • Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
  • Subject: Re: Huh? What is this?
  • Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:32:48 -0800
  • Message-id: <47C19C30(dot)6000203(at)commandprompt(dot)com>

Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 07:57 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I know that this link is only available to people on the sysadmin team,
but for reference:
https://pmt.postgresql.org/changeset/478

What is this? A site that has not been discussed at all (AFAIK - given
that it seems to happen a lot lately, maybe I'm having email delivery
It was a test site for the scripts that we had from Marc.

Are we really talking about the same thing? What does the user
"pgsqldocs" have to do with the archives - is it misnamed? Assuming
those are the scripts you got from Marc - or are you talking about yet
another thing here?

I think we are. I thought you were talking about archives2.

pgsqldocs is www.postgresqldocs.org

Where is this policy written? And we have never applied that policy to Linux hosts. Let's be consistent here please.

I don't think it's written down, and you are very well aware of that.

Yes I am. Please fill in pmt with the appropriate policy.

But what you're basically saying is you want us to move all the stuff
off the linux boxes then, to be consistent?

Funny. I almost laughed at that one. My point was the VM policy has never applied to Linux. We don't use VMs on linux (although I have never been sure why).


And I hope you're not seriously questioning the policy of discussing
things before we do them?


No, I am not. I should have posted that we were going to add pgsqldocs. That is my bad.

I didn't install it, so I don't know *what* to put in there. The person
who installed it would know what's actually involved in it, and should
add those files.

I did it and if you see my other post you will see that I verified that it was indeed already part of the system. So if there is still a problem receiving the auto backups we need to look at that specifically.


Ok - just checking that the plans hadn't changed on that one.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group