Re: Ancient Binary versions ...

["Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 20:08:15 +0100 Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> 
wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason why we are keeping them?  Is it not sufficient to keep
>> just  the latest minor version along a branch?  ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7
>> and  earlier?
>
> I think we should keep the source tarballs, but I see no reason to keep the
> binaries.

Oh ya, we have source that goes back to the v1.x days ... :)

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGNPdZ4QvfyHIvDvMRAqCAAJ9yTgjXdv4vdXelR0nvAyKn2pU/nwCgqEli
WqiiwXzB4fseSmBS+9se1Hw=
=hgNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----