Re: A counter productive conversation about search.
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:54:50 +0100
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C8BF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk> <text/plain>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: 29 August 2006 15:32
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: John Hansen; PostgreSQL WWW
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] A counter productive conversation
> about search.
>
>
> > ServerWeight 100
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/
> > ServerWeight 50
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/
> >
> > I did get shot down as well though - iirc it was Oleg who was
> > essentially saying that the search engine should not have
> any knowledge
> > of the site beyond what it crawled.
>
> That won't work in aspseek. I looked into that too. It applies the
> weight to the whole site.
Yeah, I was confusing my self with options in Mnogosearch (which is very
similar in many ways).
Regards, Dave.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index