Re: Protection from SQL injection
- From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "Thomas Kellerer" <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Protection from SQL injection
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:24:59 -0600
- Message-id: <dcc563d10804262224l431f0ae3t6c75af94a1ef3876@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> IIRC there was some discussion recently of providing a mode in which
> the server would reject PQexec strings containing more than one query.
> I didn't care for it much at the time, but I think it would provide
> most of the benefit of these suggestions with far less compatibility
> or performance hit.
agreed.
And I trust (SQL) code review more than tying the hands of the programmers.
But I've always had the luxury of working with developers who liked me
as a DBA and were willing to do things my way, as far as the DB was
concerned anyway...
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index