Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Query Join Performance
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Aaron Bono <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Query Join Performance
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:07:16 -0400
Aaron Bono wrote: > Looks like a vacuum analyze did the trick. Performance is beautiful now. I > should have tried that earlier. > > I thought I had the auto vacuum turned on (PostgreSQL 8.1) but I guess it > doesn't do analyze? > > Anyway, I will schedule a vacuum analyze nightly - it is low usage and won't > cause any problems. It should have done an analyze at some point. Unless this is Windows, in which case there's a bug that precludes autovacuum from running at all. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- References:
- Query Join Performance
- From: Aaron Bono
- Re: Query Join Performance
- From: Richard Huxton
- Re: Query Join Performance
- From: Aaron Bono
- Re: Query Join Performance
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Query Join Performance
- From: Aaron Bono
- Query Join Performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Query Join Performance
- Next by Date: Re: Which function transform x,y to latitude/longitude?
- Previous by thread: Re: Query Join Performance
- Next by thread: Which function transform x,y to latitude/longitude?
- Indexes: