Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)


  • From: Jim Nasby <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
  • To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
  • Cc: gdavis(at)refractions(dot)net, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
  • Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:40:57 -0500
  • Message-id: <DB91DDA2-F0F2-42CF-B5E8-A481E622F1CD@enterprisedb.com> <text/plain>

On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
regression=# select ('2006-09-15 23:59:00'::timestamp - '2006-09-01 09:30:41'::timestamp);
     ?column?
------------------
 14 days 14:28:19
(1 row)

should be reporting '350:28:19' instead.

This is a hack that was done to minimize the changes in the regression
test expected outputs when we changed type interval from months/ seconds
to months/days/seconds.  But I wonder whether it wasn't a dumb idea.
It is certainly inconsistent, as noted in the code comments.

I'm tempted to propose that we remove the justify_hours call, and tell
anyone who really wants the old results to apply justify_hours() to the subtraction result for themselves. Not sure what the fallout would be,
though.

I suspect there's applications out there that are relying on that being nicely formated for display purposes.

I agree it should be removed, but we might need a form of backwards compatibility for a version or two...
--
Jim Nasby                                    jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group