Re: NULL in IN clause

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Havasvölgyi Ottó <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NULL in IN clause
Date: 2005-10-19 21:00:03
Message-ID: 20051019135459.D99528@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, [iso-8859-2] Havasvlgyi Ott wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have just run this command on 8.0.4 :
>
> SELECT 'foo' WHERE 0 NOT IN (NULL, 1);
>
> And it resulted is zero rows.
> Without NULL it is OK.
> Is this a bug, or the standard has such a rule?

This is standard behavior.

Seeing if I can do this from memory...

a NOT IN b is equivalent in the spec to NOT(a IN b). a IN b is equivalent
to a =ANY b. a =ANY b returns true if a = x is true for any x in b. a =ANY
b returns false if a = x is false for all x in b. Otherwise it returns
unknown.

0 = NULL returns unknown
0 = 1 returns false
So, 0 IN (NULL,1) returns unknown.

NOT(unknown) is unknown.

WHERE clauses only return rows for which the search condition is true, so
a row is not returned.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Rouillier 2005-10-19 21:07:23 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message David Dick 2005-10-19 20:43:56 Re: NULL in IN clause