From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | LEFT JOIN ... |
Date: | 2001-06-18 17:26:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.33.0106181414511.22744-100000@mobile.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Morning ...
I'm trying to wrack my brain over something here, and no matter
how I try and look at it, I'm drawing a blank ...
I have two tables that are dependent on each other:
notes (86736 tuples) and note_links (173473 tuples)
The relationship is that one note can have several 'ppl' link'd to
it ...
I have a third table: calendar (11014 tuples) ... those calendar
entries link to a note.
So you have something like:
personA ---
personB --|--> note_links --> notes --[maybe]--> calendar entry
personC ---
now, the query I'm workign with is:
SELECT n.note, n.nid, n.type, c.act_type, c.status, nl.contact_lvl,
CASE WHEN c.act_start IS NULL
THEN date_part('epoch', n.added)
ELSE date_part('epoch', c.act_start)
END AS start
FROM note_links nl, notes n LEFT JOIN calendar c ON (n.nid = c.nid)
WHERE (n.type = 'A' OR n.type = 'N' OR n.type = 'H' OR n.type = 'C')
AND (nl.id = 15748 AND contact_lvl = 'company')
AND n.nid = nl.nid
ORDER BY start DESC;
Which explains out as:
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Sort (cost=7446.32..7446.32 rows=1 width=88)
-> Nested Loop (cost=306.52..7446.31 rows=1 width=88)
-> Index Scan using note_links_id on note_links nl (cost=0.00..3.49 rows=1 width=16)
-> Materialize (cost=6692.63..6692.63 rows=60015 width=72)
-> Hash Join (cost=306.52..6692.63 rows=60015 width=72)
-> Seq Scan on notes n (cost=0.00..2903.98 rows=60015 width=36)
-> Hash (cost=206.22..206.22 rows=10122 width=36)
-> Seq Scan on calendar c (cost=0.00..206.22 rows=10122 width=36)
EXPLAIN
and takes forever to run ...
Now, if I eliminate the LEFT JOIN part of the above, *one* tuple is
returned ... so even with the LEFT JOIN, only *one* tuple is going to be
returned ...
Is there some way to write the above so that it evaluates:
WHERE (n.type = 'A' OR n.type = 'N' OR n.type = 'H' OR n.type = 'C')
AND (nl.id = 15748 AND contact_lvl = 'company')
AND n.nid = nl.nid
first, so that it only has to do the LEFT JOIN on the *one* n.nid that is
returned, instead of the 86736 that are in the table?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-18 17:34:22 | Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-18 17:05:45 | Re: Doc translation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2001-06-18 17:28:38 | Re: Better Archives? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-06-18 16:51:08 | Re: Better Archives? |