Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: m32r tas() implementation
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de>
- Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kazuhiro Inaoka <inaoka(dot)kazuhiro(at)renesas(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: m32r tas() implementation
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:17:05 -0400
Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de> writes: > Kazuhiro Inaoka recently sent me a tas() implementation for the m32r > architecture [1]. It applies cleanly to 8.2.3 and seems otherwise > harmless. Do you consider applying it upstream? The patch seems strongly dependent on an OS as well as a chip, since <sys/tas.h> is hardly to be expected to exist everywhere. Therefore, it is at least short an #ifdef or so. More generally I wonder if it's not going at it backwards: if <sys/tas.h> exists, could we use it regardless of CPU type? regards, tom lane
- References:
- m32r tas() implementation
- From: Martin Pitt
- m32r tas() implementation
- Prev by Date: m32r tas() implementation
- Next by Date: Re: m32r tas() implementation
- Previous by thread: m32r tas() implementation
- Next by thread: Re: m32r tas() implementation
- Indexes: