• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2011-04 Thread Index (1/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 16:57)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Kevin Grittner (Sat 30 17:28)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 18:01)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Pierre C (Sat 30 18:13)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 18:19)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Kevin Grittner (Sat 30 18:37)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 21:23)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Kevin Grittner (Sat 30 18:24)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 21:15)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Jeff Janes (Sat 30 22:12)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Joel Reymont (Sat 30 22:29)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Jeff Janes (Sun 01 00:13)
• Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows Samuel Gendler (Sun 01 01:06)
• 8.4.7, incorrect estimate Wayne Conrad (Fri 29 18:29)
• Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate Kevin Grittner (Fri 29 19:13)
• Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate Kevin Grittner (Fri 29 19:34)
• Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate Tom Lane (Fri 29 20:58)
• FUSION-IO io cards Mark Steben (Fri 29 14:24)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Stephen Cook (Fri 29 14:33)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Ivan Voras (Fri 29 14:41)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards gnuoytr (Fri 29 14:45)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Ben Chobot (Fri 29 14:54)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Tyler Mills (Fri 29 15:25)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Joachim Worringen (Fri 29 16:34)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards gnuoytr (Fri 29 16:52)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Joachim Worringen (Fri 29 19:15)
• Re: FUSION-IO io cards Greg Smith (Fri 29 19:03)
• pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters Jorgen (Fri 29 13:02)
• Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters Tatsuo Ishii (Sat 30 01:28)
• Will shared_buffers crash a server Qiang Wang (Fri 29 07:13)
• Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server Claudio Freire (Fri 29 07:42)
• Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server Achilleas Mantzios (Fri 29 07:48)
• Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server Scott Marlowe (Fri 29 10:34)
• Re: {Spam} Will shared_buffers crash a server French, Martin (Fri 29 10:37)
• Order of tables Rishabh Kumar Jain (Thu 28 09:20)
• Re: Order of tables Robert Klemme (Thu 28 12:31)
• Re: Order of tables Heikki Linnakangas (Thu 28 12:33)
• Re: Order of tables Rishabh Kumar Jain (Fri 29 11:07)
• VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql? HSIEN-WEN CHU (Thu 28 03:42)
• Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql? Greg Smith (Fri 29 00:13)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql? Greg Smith (Sat 30 04:46)
• Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables Robert Haas (Wed 27 20:36)
• Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables Joseph Shraibman (Wed 27 21:42)
• Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables Samuel Gendler (Thu 28 00:59)
• Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables Greg Smith (Thu 28 02:18)
• Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables Robert Haas (Fri 29 22:53)
• Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Dhimant Patel (Wed 27 15:28)
• Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Tom Lane (Wed 27 16:12)
• Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Maciek Sakrejda (Wed 27 16:12)
• Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Kevin Grittner (Wed 27 16:18)
• Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Phoenix Kiula (Wed 27 16:46)
• Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type. Dhimant Patel (Wed 27 18:34)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Kevin Grittner (Wed 27 12:41)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Sok Ann Yap (Wed 27 22:35)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Kevin Grittner (Wed 27 23:23)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Sok Ann Yap (Thu 28 00:47)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Samuel Gendler (Thu 28 11:32)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Jeff Janes (Thu 28 15:56)
• optimizing a cpu-heavy query Joel Reymont (Tue 26 15:21)
• tuning on ec2 Joel Reymont (Tue 26 15:20)
• reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Sok Ann Yap (Tue 26 09:49)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Kevin Grittner (Tue 26 21:37)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Sok Ann Yap (Tue 26 23:23)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Merlin Moncure (Wed 27 01:04)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Claudio Freire (Wed 27 07:22)
• Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan Claudio Freire (Wed 27 07:23)
• Re: Slow deleting tables with foreign keys Robert Haas (Mon 25 23:54)
• Time to put theory to the test? J Sisson (Mon 25 19:31)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Rob Wultsch (Tue 26 03:11)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Mark Kirkwood (Tue 26 06:31)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? J Sisson (Tue 26 14:44)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Kevin Grittner (Tue 26 15:07)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Kenneth Marshall (Tue 26 17:04)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Scott Marlowe (Tue 26 15:08)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? gnuoytr (Tue 26 15:24)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Tom Lane (Tue 26 15:51)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Magnus Hagander (Tue 26 15:54)
• Re: Time to put theory to the test? Josh Berkus (Tue 26 17:57)
• OT (slightly) testing for data loss on an SSD drive due to power failure John Rouillard (Fri 22 14:04)
• Re: OT (slightly) testing for data loss on an SSD drive due to power failure Greg Smith (Sat 23 02:47)
• Checkpoint execution overrun impact? drvillo (Fri 22 09:21)
• Issue with partition elimination Paul Pierce (Fri 22 01:26)
• Re: Issue with partition elimination Josh Berkus (Mon 25 18:11)
• oom_killer Tory M Blue (Thu 21 08:28)
• Re: oom_killer yoshi watanabe (Thu 21 12:37)
• Re: oom_killer Stephen Frost (Thu 21 12:48)
• Re: oom_killer Claudio Freire (Thu 21 12:53)
• Re: oom_killer Claudio Freire (Thu 21 13:02)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Thu 21 15:54)
• Re: oom_killer Merlin Moncure (Thu 21 14:27)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Thu 21 15:52)
• Re: oom_killer Claudio Freire (Thu 21 15:58)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Thu 21 16:15)
• Re: oom_killer Claudio Freire (Thu 21 16:37)
• Re: oom_killer Scott Marlowe (Thu 21 20:04)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Thu 21 20:08)
• Re: oom_killer Scott Marlowe (Thu 21 20:12)
• Re: oom_killer Merlin Moncure (Thu 21 20:12)
• Re: oom_killer J Sisson (Thu 21 20:08)
• Re: oom_killer Cédric Villemain (Fri 22 11:03)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Fri 22 16:27)
• Re: oom_killer Kevin Grittner (Fri 22 16:34)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Fri 22 16:37)
• Re: oom_killer Cédric Villemain (Fri 22 16:46)
• Re: oom_killer Cédric Villemain (Fri 22 16:46)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Fri 22 17:18)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Fri 22 19:03)
• Re: oom_killer Cédric Villemain (Fri 22 19:19)
• Re: oom_killer Claudio Freire (Fri 22 23:19)
• Re: oom_killer David Rees (Fri 22 18:16)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Fri 22 18:22)
• Re: oom_killer Robert Haas (Sat 23 19:24)
• Re: oom_killer Tory M Blue (Sun 24 04:22)
• rant ? check the BBWC mark (Thu 21 02:14)
• Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Josh Berkus (Wed 20 23:49)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Tom Lane (Thu 21 00:49)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Josh Berkus (Thu 21 01:59)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Brendan Jurd (Thu 21 02:05)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Josh Berkus (Thu 21 02:13)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Brendan Jurd (Thu 21 02:17)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Josh Berkus (Thu 21 02:18)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Claudio Freire (Thu 21 07:30)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Claudio Freire (Thu 21 07:35)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Josh Berkus (Thu 21 17:36)
• Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? Tom Lane (Thu 21 02:45)
• %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003 Allen Sooredoo (Wed 20 15:56)
• Re: %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003 Pavel Stehule (Thu 21 06:02)
• Re: %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003 Robert Haas (Mon 25 23:44)
• not using partial index Willy-Bas Loos (Wed 20 08:47)
• Re: not using partial index Tom Lane (Wed 20 13:26)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: not using partial index Henry (Sat 23 15:45)
• Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests Joby Joba (Wed 20 07:58)
• Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Robert Haas (Tue 19 14:23)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Robert Haas (Tue 19 14:29)
• Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Josh Berkus (Wed 20 01:50)
• Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Robert Haas (Sat 23 16:11)
• postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Tue 19 09:15)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Tue 19 09:28)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Greg Smith (Tue 19 12:11)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Tue 19 12:36)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Tue 19 12:49)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Jeff (Wed 20 12:39)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Wed 20 14:01)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Shaun Thomas (Wed 20 15:40)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Thu 21 08:02)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) (Tue 19 13:22)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Laurent Laborde (Tue 19 13:44)
• Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 Marinos Yannikos (Fri 22 21:53)
• How to configure a read-only database server? Stefan Keller (Mon 18 22:10)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? philippe (Tue 19 07:51)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? Robert Klemme (Tue 19 08:58)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? Greg Smith (Tue 19 14:30)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? Robert Haas (Sat 23 16:09)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? Stefan Keller (Sun 24 09:39)
• Re: How to configure a read-only database server? Tomas Vondra (Sun 24 12:37)
• Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array Robert Haas (Mon 18 21:56)
• Assessing performance of fetches John Rouillard (Mon 18 19:16)
• Re: Assessing performance of fetches Tom Lane (Mon 18 19:41)
• Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3 Robert Haas (Mon 18 16:52)
• Re: Custom operator class costs Robert Haas (Mon 18 16:40)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Robert Haas (Mon 18 16:38)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Uwe Bartels (Mon 18 22:00)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Robert Klemme (Tue 19 08:30)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Uwe Bartels (Tue 19 08:48)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Robert Klemme (Tue 19 09:09)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Claudio Freire (Tue 19 09:22)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Robert Haas (Sat 23 19:33)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Uwe Bartels (Sun 24 19:01)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Віталій Тимчишин (Mon 25 14:22)
• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by Uwe Bartels (Mon 25 19:01)
• Re: Index use difference betweer LIKE, LIKE ANY? Robert Haas (Mon 18 16:35)
• Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3? Sethu Prasad (Mon 18 15:05)
• Re: Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3? Nikolas Everett (Mon 18 15:12)
• Re: Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3? Samuel Gendler (Mon 18 16:33)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Phoenix Kiula (Sun 17 15:30)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Scott Marlowe (Sun 17 15:44)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Scott Marlowe (Sun 17 16:10)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Phoenix (Sun 17 17:00)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Alan Hodgson (Sun 17 18:14)
• Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!) Shashank Tripathi (Sun 17 18:52)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc