• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2010-05 Thread Index (1/2)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• planner costs in "warm cache" tests Jesper Krogh (Sun 30 17:41)
• Re: planner costs in "warm cache" tests Tom Lane (Sun 30 18:35)
• Re: planner costs in "warm cache" tests Jesper Krogh (Mon 31 18:48)
• Re: planner costs in "warm cache" tests Tom Lane (Mon 31 19:55)
• Re: Strange workaround for slow query Sander Verhagen (Sat 29 21:19)
• Zeus IOPS Scott Marlowe (Fri 28 19:49)
• Re: Zeus IOPS Brad Nicholson (Mon 31 13:15)
• Re: Zeus IOPS Scott Marlowe (Mon 31 13:20)
• Wildly inaccurate query plan Thom Brown (Fri 28 18:27)
• Re: Wildly inaccurate query plan Tom Lane (Fri 28 18:54)
• Re: Wildly inaccurate query plan Thom Brown (Fri 28 19:06)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Wildly inaccurate query plan Kevin Grittner (Sat 29 17:01)
• hp hpsa vs cciss driver Mark Wong (Fri 28 01:24)
• Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Carlo Stonebanks (Thu 27 19:29)
• Re: Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Kevin Grittner (Thu 27 20:27)
• Re: Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Craig James (Thu 27 21:21)
• Re: Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Thomas Kellerer (Thu 27 21:26)
• Re: Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Kevin Grittner (Thu 27 21:28)
• Re: Does FILTER in SEQSCAN short-circuit AND? Craig James (Thu 27 21:44)
• About Tom Lane's Xeon CS test case 黄永卫 (Thu 27 07:27)
• Re: About Tom Lane's Xeon CS test case Tom Lane (Thu 27 14:10)
• PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Eliot Gable (Wed 26 16:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Stephen Frost (Wed 26 16:18)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Eliot Gable (Wed 26 16:29)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Stephen Frost (Wed 26 16:32)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Eliot Gable (Wed 26 16:41)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Stephen Frost (Wed 26 16:47)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Craig James (Wed 26 17:09)
• Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL Merlin Moncure (Fri 28 12:22)
• Re: [BUGS] Query causing explosion of temp space with join involving partitioning Krzysztof Nienartowicz (Wed 26 15:28)
• Re: [BUGS] Query causing explosion of temp space with join involving partitioning Tom Lane (Thu 27 16:41)
• tunning pgsql 7.3.7 over RHEL 4.0 32 x86 (2.6.9-5ELsmp) Juan Pablo Sandoval Rivera (Tue 25 14:04)
• Re: tunning pgsql 7.3.7 over RHEL 4.0 32 x86 (2.6.9-5ELsmp) Joshua Tolley (Tue 25 14:27)
• Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select Tyler Hildebrandt (Tue 25 09:59)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select A. Kretschmer (Tue 25 10:30)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select Tyler Hildebrandt (Tue 25 13:41)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select Merlin Moncure (Tue 25 14:55)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select Merlin Moncure (Tue 25 14:57)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as a function instead of select Jorge Montero (Tue 25 16:19)
• performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Tue 25 08:16)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Tue 25 08:49)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Tue 25 09:00)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Thom Brown (Tue 25 09:16)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Tue 25 09:32)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Tue 25 09:38)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Tue 25 10:01)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Andres Freund (Tue 25 10:42)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Wed 26 16:03)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Wed 26 16:48)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Joachim Worringen (Fri 28 11:04)
• Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables Rob Wultsch (Fri 28 17:08)
• Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Tue 25 05:54)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Tue 25 06:41)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Kevin Grittner (Tue 25 18:28)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Tue 25 23:27)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Tom Lane (Wed 26 00:24)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 03:50)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Alexey Klyukin (Wed 26 09:00)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 16:30)
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner tv (Wed 26 18:16)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 18:55)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Rob Wultsch (Wed 26 00:57)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 06:13)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner tv (Wed 26 10:28)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Kevin Grittner (Wed 26 15:55)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 18:27)
• Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Wed 26 20:21)
• Message not available
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Thu 27 07:43)
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 08:03)
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Thu 27 15:56)
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 18:29)
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner Bryan Hinton (Thu 27 22:04)
  • Re: Random Page Cost and Planner David Jarvis (Fri 28 03:29)
• which hardware setup Pedro Axelrud (Mon 24 21:03)
• Re: which hardware setup Jesper Krogh (Tue 25 06:22)
• Re: which hardware setup Pedro Axelrud (Tue 25 17:07)
• Certain query eating up all free memory (out of memory error) Łukasz Dejneka (Mon 24 16:50)
• Certain query eating up all free memory (out of memory error) Łukasz Dejneka (Tue 25 06:16)
• Re: Certain query eating up all free memory (out of memory error) Łukasz Dejneka (Tue 25 06:37)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Mon 24 11:26)
• [SPAM] Re: shared_buffers advice Ben Chobot (Mon 24 15:27)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Wed 26 09:48)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Thu 27 07:24)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 07:51)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Thu 27 09:00)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 10:29)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Thu 27 15:18)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 15:25)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Thu 27 15:51)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Thu 27 18:22)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Fri 28 07:57)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Cédric Villemain (Fri 28 08:13)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: shared_buffers advice Merlin Moncure (Mon 24 18:26)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Konrad Garus (Tue 25 09:58)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Merlin Moncure (Tue 25 21:03)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Greg Smith (Fri 28 18:58)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Merlin Moncure (Fri 28 20:31)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Greg Smith (Fri 28 21:03)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Merlin Moncure (Fri 28 21:16)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Scott Marlowe (Fri 28 21:11)
• Re: shared_buffers advice Dave Crooke (Fri 28 21:14)
• prepared query performs much worse than regular query Richard Yen (Fri 21 22:53)
• Re: prepared query performs much worse than regular query Rosser Schwarz (Sat 22 00:30)
• Re: prepared query performs much worse than regular query Matthew Wakeling (Sat 22 03:26)
• Re: prepared query performs much worse than regular query Scott Carey (Tue 25 18:28)
• Re: prepared query performs much worse than regular query Joshua Tolley (Tue 25 19:02)
• Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as function instead of select Tyler Hildebrandt (Fri 21 14:28)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as function instead of select Craig Ringer (Thu 27 15:34)
• Re: Query timing increased from 3s to 55s when used as function instead of select Craig Ringer (Thu 27 15:56)
• Autovacuum in postgres. venu madhav (Fri 21 09:38)
• Re: Autovacuum in postgres. venu madhav (Fri 21 09:39)
• Re: Autovacuum in postgres. Bruce Momjian (Thu 27 14:33)
• Re: Autovacuum in postgres. alvherre (Thu 27 16:10)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Autovacuum in postgres. Bruce Momjian (Thu 27 15:07)
• Query causing explosion of temp space with join involving partitioning Krzysztof Nienartowicz (Thu 20 14:00)
• Re: [BUGS] Query causing explosion of temp space with join involving partitioning Tom Lane (Thu 20 19:22)
• Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 05:06)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Thu 20 08:20)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Thom Brown (Thu 20 08:33)
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Thom Brown (Thu 20 18:37)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Thom Brown (Thu 20 18:59)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Tom Lane (Thu 20 19:02)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Thom Brown (Thu 20 19:21)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 19:46)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Tom Lane (Thu 20 19:53)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 19:58)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Tom Lane (Thu 20 20:04)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 20:09)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Tom Lane (Thu 20 20:19)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 20:30)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Stephen Frost (Thu 20 21:01)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 00:46)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Fri 21 08:38)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Fri 21 08:45)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 15:18)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Fri 21 18:49)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Stephen Frost (Fri 21 19:18)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Sat 22 17:54)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Matthew Wakeling (Fri 21 15:08)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Fri 21 18:21)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Matthew Wakeling (Fri 21 19:12)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Yeb Havinga (Thu 20 21:08)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 02:02)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Matthew Wakeling (Fri 21 03:28)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 04:12)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Sun 23 22:55)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Matthew Wakeling (Thu 20 13:03)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Tom Lane (Thu 20 13:57)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 15:43)
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Thu 20 20:19)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Stephen Frost (Thu 20 21:30)
      • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 00:19)
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Sat 22 08:11)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? Stephen Frost (Thu 20 21:19)
• Re: Optimize date query for large child tables: GiST or GIN? David Jarvis (Fri 21 00:28)
• merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Wed 19 00:17)
• Re: merge join killing performance Matthew Wakeling (Wed 19 03:00)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Wed 19 03:06)
• Re: merge join killing performance Tom Lane (Wed 19 16:53)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Wed 19 17:08)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Wed 19 20:27)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Wed 19 20:47)
• Re: merge join killing performance Matthew Wakeling (Thu 20 01:46)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Thu 20 02:04)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Thu 20 02:06)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Thu 20 02:07)
• Re: merge join killing performance Tom Lane (Thu 20 14:28)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Thu 20 14:35)
• Re: merge join killing performance Tom Lane (Fri 28 01:16)
• Re: merge join killing performance Scott Marlowe (Fri 28 02:46)
• Re: merge join killing performance Tom Lane (Fri 28 02:56)
• Benchmark with FreeBSD 8.0 and pgbench joao.pinheiro (Sat 15 16:42)
• Re: Benchmark with FreeBSD 8.0 and pgbench Josh Berkus (Sat 15 19:48)
• Re: Benchmark with FreeBSD 8.0 and pgbench joao.pinheiro (Sat 15 20:41)
• Re: Benchmark with FreeBSD 8.0 and pgbench Віталій Тимчишин (Mon 17 07:06)
• old server, new server, same performance Piotr Legiecki (Fri 14 08:51)
• Re: old server, new server, same performance Scott Marlowe (Fri 14 22:52)
• Re: old server, new server, same performance Scott Carey (Sat 15 00:47)
• Re: old server, new server, same performance Piotr Legiecki (Mon 17 08:06)
• Re: old server, new server, same performance Scott Marlowe (Mon 17 08:11)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc