• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2009-10 Thread Index (1/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Modeling a table with arbitrary columns Andreas Hartmann (Thu 29 20:53)
• Re: Modeling a table with arbitrary columns Thomas Kellerer (Thu 29 21:25)
• Re: Modeling a table with arbitrary columns Віталій Тимчишин (Fri 30 10:18)
• Re: Modeling a table with arbitrary columns Robert Haas (Sat 31 13:03)
• database size growing continously Peter Meszaros (Thu 29 15:12)
• Re: database size growing continously Ludwik Dylag (Thu 29 15:34)
• Re: database size growing continously Josh Rovero (Thu 29 15:42)
• Re: database size growing continously Matthew Wakeling (Thu 29 16:00)
• Re: database size growing continously Ludwik Dylag (Thu 29 16:01)
• Re: database size growing continously Joshua D. Drake (Thu 29 16:15)
• Re: database size growing continously Chris Ernst (Thu 29 16:14)
• Re: database size growing continously Steve Crawford (Thu 29 16:21)
• Re: database size growing continously Steve Crawford (Thu 29 16:40)
• Re: database size growing continously Merlin Moncure (Fri 30 12:43)
• Re: database size growing continously Jeremy Harris (Fri 30 19:13)
• Re: database size growing continously Anj Adu (Fri 30 19:53)
• Re: database size growing continously Greg Stark (Fri 30 20:02)
• Re: database size growing continously Anj Adu (Fri 30 20:11)
• Re: database size growing continously Jeremy Harris (Fri 30 20:18)
• Re: database size growing continously Greg Stark (Fri 30 22:17)
• Re: database size growing continously Scott Marlowe (Thu 29 17:00)
• sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Anj Adu (Wed 28 18:13)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Thu 29 09:54)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Angayarkanni (Thu 29 10:33)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Anj Adu (Thu 29 14:10)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Bob Lunney (Thu 29 15:29)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Robert Haas (Thu 29 15:35)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Anj Adu (Thu 29 15:40)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Fri 30 12:35)
• Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan Robert Haas (Fri 30 15:03)
• Postgresql optimisation Denis BUCHER (Wed 28 12:11)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Wed 28 12:26)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Denis BUCHER (Wed 28 13:49)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Wed 28 14:17)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Kevin Grittner (Wed 28 14:39)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Denis BUCHER (Wed 28 16:08)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Greg Smith (Wed 28 16:20)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Denis BUCHER (Thu 29 14:32)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Dave Dutcher (Wed 28 16:30)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Matthew Wakeling (Wed 28 16:37)
• Re: Postgresql optimisation Dave Dutcher (Wed 28 17:23)
• bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh (Mon 26 20:13)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer (Tue 27 04:57)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh (Tue 27 05:09)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer (Tue 27 05:34)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh (Tue 27 05:45)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer (Tue 27 06:14)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh (Tue 27 06:42)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Robert Haas (Tue 27 14:48)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). jesper (Tue 27 15:08)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Robert Haas (Wed 28 01:25)
• Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Tom Lane (Thu 29 15:25)
• Calculating selectivity for the query-planner on ts_vector colums. Jesper Krogh (Fri 23 18:39)
• Re: Calculating selectivity for the query-planner on ts_vector colums. Tom Lane (Fri 23 19:11)
• Re: Calculating selectivity for the query-planner on ts_vector colums. Jesper Krogh (Fri 23 19:30)
• query planning different in plpgsql? Michal J . Kubski (Fri 23 15:44)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Scott Mead (Fri 23 15:50)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Fri 23 15:56)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Michal J . Kubski (Mon 26 10:05)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Merlin Moncure (Mon 26 13:45)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Michal J . Kubski (Mon 26 18:02)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Tom Lane (Mon 26 19:34)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Waldomiro (Mon 26 20:11)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Michal J. Kubski (Thu 29 14:32)
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Michal J. Kubski (Thu 29 14:28)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Tom Lane (Fri 23 16:20)
• Re: query planning different in plpgsql? Scott Carey (Thu 29 16:44)
• Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Kevin Buckham (Thu 22 19:16)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Kevin Grittner (Thu 22 19:25)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Scott Carey (Thu 22 21:34)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Scara Maccai (Fri 23 07:23)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Kevin Buckham (Fri 23 19:18)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Stephen Frost (Fri 23 22:55)
• Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries Greg Smith (Sun 25 00:22)
• Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jesper Krogh (Thu 22 16:28)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Kevin Grittner (Thu 22 18:51)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jeff Davis (Thu 22 22:57)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jesper Krogh (Fri 23 05:19)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jeff Davis (Fri 23 05:43)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. jesper (Fri 23 07:46)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Richard Huxton (Fri 23 08:26)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. jesper (Fri 23 09:04)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Richard Huxton (Fri 23 14:31)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jeff Davis (Fri 23 15:55)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Richard Huxton (Fri 23 16:28)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jeff Davis (Fri 23 19:22)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jeff Davis (Fri 23 16:05)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jesper Krogh (Fri 23 18:13)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jesper Krogh (Fri 30 19:46)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Tom Lane (Sat 31 03:11)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Jesper Krogh (Sat 31 06:20)
• Re: Queryplan within FTS/GIN index -search. Greg Stark (Sat 31 08:56)
• optimizing query with multiple aggregates Doug Cole (Wed 21 22:51)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Merlin Moncure (Thu 22 00:39)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Doug Cole (Thu 22 02:21)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Nikolas Everett (Thu 22 02:48)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Marc Mamin (Mon 26 09:40)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Robert Haas (Thu 22 13:27)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates David Wilson (Thu 22 02:47)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Kenneth Marshall (Thu 22 13:22)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Doug Cole (Thu 29 22:25)
• Re: optimizing query with multiple aggregates Scott Carey (Thu 22 21:49)
• Are unreferenced TOASTed values retrieved? William Blunn (Wed 21 18:28)
• Re: Are unreferenced TOASTed values retrieved? Tom Lane (Wed 21 19:12)
• Random penalties on GIN index updates? jesper (Wed 21 15:03)
• Re: Random penalties on GIN index updates? Tom Lane (Wed 21 15:14)
• Re: Random penalties on GIN index updates? Jesper Krogh (Wed 21 17:58)
• Re: Random penalties on GIN index updates? Tom Lane (Wed 21 18:35)
• Re: Random penalties on GIN index updates? Robert Haas (Thu 22 03:16)
• Re: Random penalties on GIN index updates? Jesper Krogh (Thu 22 04:58)
• Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Shaul Dar (Tue 20 12:37)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Shaul Dar (Tue 20 12:46)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 A. Kretschmer (Tue 20 12:54)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Tom Lane (Tue 20 13:59)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Melton Low (Tue 20 16:14)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Shaul Dar (Wed 21 11:52)
• Re: Finding rows in table T1 that DO NOT MATCH any row in table T2 Scott Carey (Wed 21 18:11)
• maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch phb07(at)apra(dot)asso(dot)fr (Mon 19 19:32)
• Re: maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch Jeff Davis (Mon 19 22:06)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch phb07(at)apra(dot)asso(dot)fr (Wed 21 17:55)
• Re: maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch Heikki Linnakangas (Thu 22 06:56)
• Known Bottlenecks Vikul Khosla (Mon 19 13:43)
• Re: Known Bottlenecks Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Mon 19 13:47)
• Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Jesper Krogh (Sun 18 16:50)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Tom Lane (Sun 18 18:20)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Jesper Krogh (Sun 18 18:56)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Tom Lane (Sun 18 19:48)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Jesper Krogh (Fri 23 20:33)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Tom Lane (Fri 23 22:06)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Jesper Krogh (Mon 26 19:20)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Tom Lane (Mon 26 19:25)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Scott Marlowe (Fri 23 22:08)
• Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 Jesper Krogh (Sat 24 04:06)
• Calculation of unused columns Volker Grabsch (Sat 17 23:40)
• Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 00:09)
• Message not available
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 01:41)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Robert Haas (Sun 18 02:12)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 03:46)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Daniel Migowski (Sun 18 15:17)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 16:00)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tim Landscheidt (Sun 18 17:36)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Jeff Janes (Sun 18 17:59)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Robert Haas (Sun 18 20:00)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 20:54)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Robert Haas (Sun 18 22:54)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Sun 18 23:41)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Mon 19 16:01)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Gerhard Wiesinger (Mon 19 17:56)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Mon 19 18:05)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Simon Riggs (Mon 19 17:36)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Mon 19 17:43)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Simon Riggs (Mon 19 17:49)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Mon 19 17:58)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Simon Riggs (Mon 19 18:09)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Tom Lane (Mon 19 18:24)
  • Re: Calculation of unused columns Kevin Grittner (Mon 19 17:48)
• Indexes on low cardinality columns Vikul Khosla (Fri 16 23:43)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Greg Stark (Sat 17 01:27)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Vikul Khosla (Sat 17 15:28)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Vikul Khosla (Sat 17 17:03)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Robert Haas (Sat 17 17:34)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Jeff Janes (Sat 17 21:24)
• Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns Ron Mayer (Mon 19 13:59)
• Improving join performance over multiple moderately wide tables miller_2555 (Fri 16 21:12)
• Re: Improving join performance over multiple moderately wide tables Robert Haas (Mon 19 00:49)
• There is a statistic table? waldomiro (Fri 16 03:49)
• Re: There is a statistic table? Scott Marlowe (Fri 16 04:28)
• Re: There is a statistic table? Albe Laurenz (Fri 16 06:28)
• Re: There is a statistic table? Scott Carey (Wed 21 17:18)
• Re: There is a statistic table? Scott Marlowe (Wed 21 22:06)
• Re: There is a statistic table? Cédric Villemain (Thu 22 11:05)
• Regarding facing lot of time Consumed by Socket.Poll() keshav upadhyaya (Thu 15 14:03)
• [OT] Recommended whitebox server vendors in the UK? Glyn Astill (Thu 15 09:35)
• sequential scan on child partition tables Anj Adu (Wed 14 22:45)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• sequential scan on child partition tables Anj Adu (Thu 15 02:31)
• Re: sequential scan on child partition tables Tom Lane (Thu 15 05:15)
• Message not available
  • Re: sequential scan on child partition tables Anj Adu (Thu 15 20:51)
  • Re: sequential scan on child partition tables Scott Marlowe (Sun 18 05:08)
• Re: sequential scan on child partition tables Anj Adu (Sun 18 15:24)
• Getting a random row Shaul Dar (Tue 13 15:17)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc