Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
pgsql-performance 2009-08 Chronological Index (2/2)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:14:40 2012
338 messages
13 August 2009
Re: Under the hood of views David Kerr (23:04)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Josh Berkus (22:35)
Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Robert Haas (22:25)
Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age100m? ) Kevin Grittner (22:17)
Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Alvaro Herrera (21:58)
Re: Memory usage of writer process Scott Carey (21:43)
freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis (21:32)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus (21:15)
Re: Memory usage of writer process Alex Neth (21:08)
Re: Memory usage of writer process Alvaro Herrera (20:30)
Re: Under the hood of views Richard Huxton (16:28)
Under the hood of views David Kerr (16:08)
Re: How to run this in reasonable time: Matthew Wakeling (14:36)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner (14:35)
Re: How to run this in reasonable time: Greg Stark (14:26)
How to run this in reasonable time: Matthew Wakeling (14:16)
Re: transaction delays to apply Nickolay (13:52)
Re: transaction delays to apply Nickolay (11:54)
Less expensive proprietary or Open source ETL tools Rstat (09:22)
Memory usage of writer process Alex (04:51)
12 August 2009
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane (21:57)
Re: transaction delays to apply Tom Lane (21:37)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner (21:33)
Re: transaction delays to apply Pierre Frédéric Caillau d (21:32)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane (21:23)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner (18:23)
transaction delays to apply Nickolay (16:41)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Torsten Zühlsdorff (06:50)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas (01:11)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane (00:54)
11 August 2009
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas (21:46)
Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus (21:35)
Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus (21:14)
10 August 2009
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas (16:22)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kevin Grittner (15:23)
Re: Bottleneck? Robert Haas (12:02)
Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe (07:07)
Re: Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John (06:22)
Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Robert Haas (01:30)
09 August 2009
Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Fizu (19:26)
Re: Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Culley Harrelson (13:38)
Re: Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Robert Haas (03:41)
08 August 2009
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane (19:25)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera (19:21)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane (19:15)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera (18:59)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane (18:49)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane (18:25)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera (17:57)
Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Michael Andreen (17:16)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane (16:02)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Pierre Frédéric Caillau d (09:24)
ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Fizu (06:08)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Bruce Momjian (06:02)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas (03:37)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe (03:03)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Carey (01:34)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe (00:42)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe (00:41)
Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Greg Stark (00:28)
07 August 2009
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Scott Carey (21:10)
PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Josh Kupershmidt (20:18)
Re: postgresql and syslog Alvaro Herrera (19:57)
Re: postgresql and syslog Michael Nacos (13:06)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas (12:53)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kees van Dieren (08:02)
Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Euler Taveira de Oliveira (07:37)
06 August 2009
Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Kenneth Marshall (19:02)
Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Scott Marlowe (19:02)
Best settings to load a fresh database Campbell, Lance (18:43)
Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake (16:53)
Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell (16:38)
Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake (16:13)
Re: Bottleneck? Kenneth Cox (15:57)
Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell (15:43)
Re: Bottleneck? Tom Lane (15:02)
Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell (14:53)
Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe (07:03)
Re: Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John (06:23)
Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe (06:15)
Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn (05:21)
Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn (05:14)
Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe (04:53)
Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn (04:30)
Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe (04:19)
Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John (02:51)
05 August 2009
Re: Query help Scott Carey (19:31)
Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84 (19:17)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey (17:00)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure (14:13)
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Tom Lane (14:12)
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling (13:54)
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Robert Haas (13:43)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Russell Smith (10:23)
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling (10:20)
Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kees van Dieren (05:02)
04 August 2009
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Greg Stark (23:28)
CHECK constraint fails when it's not supposed to Richard Yen (23:03)
Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Robert Haas (22:56)
postgresql and syslog Ibrahim Harrani (21:16)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Tom Lane (20:41)
CHECK constraint fails when it's not supposed to richyen (18:23)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey (17:32)
Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84 (17:14)
GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling (16:06)
Re: Query help Kevin Grittner (15:57)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Alvaro Herrera (15:37)
Re: select count(idn) is slow (Seq Scan) instead of Bitmap Heap.. why? Robert Haas (13:46)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure (13:29)
03 August 2009
Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84 (21:18)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure (20:50)
Re: Query help Kevin Grittner (20:45)
Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84 (20:20)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions PFC (20:13)
Re: Query help Kevin Grittner (19:48)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey (19:28)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Tom Lane (18:56)
Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84 (17:17)
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey (17:01)
Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version Marc Cousin (11:46)
Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (11:14)
Re: Greenplum MapReduce Richard Huxton (09:50)
Re: Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy (09:37)
Re: Greenplum MapReduce Richard Huxton (09:25)
Re: Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy (04:58)
Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0 Robert Haas (02:17)
Re: Greenplum MapReduce Chris (02:05)
FW: Performance 8.4.0 Chris Dunn (02:04)
02 August 2009
Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version PFC (20:31)
Re: Performance Monitoring tool Frits Hoogland (18:08)
Re: Performance 8.4.0 Stephen Frost (17:30)
select count(idn) is slow (Seq Scan) instead of Bitmap Heap.. why? Adam PAPAI (16:50)
Re: Performance 8.4.0 Robert Haas (15:25)
01 August 2009
31 July 2009
Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version pari krishnan (05:52)
Performance Monitoring tool mukeshp (05:50)
30 July 2009
Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy (12:25)