Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
- To: "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:43:08 -0500
- Message-id: <4A71CD9C020000250002916D@gw.wicourts.gov> <text/plain>
Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote: > Gzip does have some quirky performance behavior depending on the > chunk size of data you stream into it. Yeah, I've run into that before. If we're sending each individual datum to a gzip function rather than waiting until we've got a decent-size buffer, that could explain it. -Kevin
- References:
- Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- From: Kevin Grittner
- Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- From: Scott Carey
- Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Next by Date: Re: autovacuum 'stuck' ?
- Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Indexes: