Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
- Cc: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:15 -0400
- Message-id: <15122.1248974895@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Since the dump to custom format ran longer than the full pg_dump
> piped directly to psql would have taken, the overall time to use this
> technique is clearly longer for our databases on our hardware.
Hmmm ... AFAIR there isn't a good reason for dump to custom format to
take longer than plain text dump, except for applying compression.
Maybe -Z0 would be worth testing? Or is the problem that you have to
write the data to a disk file rather than just piping it?
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index