Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions


  • From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
  • To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
  • Cc: tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz, Rauan Maemirov <rauan(at)maemirov(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
  • Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:58:20 -0700
  • Message-id: <4A71D12C.3070406@pinpointresearch.com> <text/plain>

Kevin Grittner wrote:
Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
benchmarks I've seen suggest that with 8 cores you may even see an
almost 8x restore speedup
I'm curious what sort of data in what environment showed that ratio.
Was going on memory from a presentation I watched. Reports on the web have shown anything from a 3x increase using 8 cores to other non-detailed reports of "up to" 8x improvement. If you have one big table, don't expect much if any improvement. If you have lots of smaller tables/indexes then parallel restore will probably benefit you. This is all based on the not-atypical assumption that your restore will be CPU bound. I don't think parallel restore will be much use beyond the point you hit IO limits.

Cheers,
Steve



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group