• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2009-05 Chronological Index (3/3)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 08 May 2009
  • Re: Statistics use with functions Matthew Wakeling (16:11)
  • Re: Statistics use with functions Tom Lane (15:48)
  • Statistics use with functions Matthew Wakeling (13:46)
  • Re: Indexes not used in DELETE Viktor Rosenfeld (10:18)
  • Rohan Pethkar sent you a Friend Request on Yaari Rohan Pethkar (05:47)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? david (02:52)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Robert Haas (02:25)
• 07 May 2009
  • Re: Indexes not used in DELETE Tom Lane (23:07)
  • Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query David Blewett (22:56)
  • Indexes not used in DELETE Viktor Rosenfeld (22:47)
  • Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query Tom Lane (22:44)
  • Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query David Blewett (22:41)
  • Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query Tom Lane (20:31)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Simon Riggs (19:53)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (18:37)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Scott Carey (17:37)
  • Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query David Blewett (17:28)
  • Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query David Blewett (17:01)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan Nikolas Everett (15:37)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Alvaro Herrera (15:27)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan Matthew Wakeling (15:19)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan Nikolas Everett (15:18)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan David Brain (15:12)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan Matthew Wakeling (14:53)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan David Brain (14:49)
  • Re: Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan Scott Mead (14:32)
  • Slow select performance despite seemingly reasonable query plan David Brain (14:20)
  • Re: GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling (12:39)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Simon Riggs (12:20)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Gregory Stark (11:58)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Merlin Moncure (11:35)
  • Re: GiST index performance Oleg Bartunov (11:22)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Simon Riggs (08:52)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:49)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:20)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Craig Ringer (02:56)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Alvaro Herrera (02:32)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Tom Lane (02:27)
• 06 May 2009
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Simon Riggs (22:54)
  • Re: GiST index performance Tom Lane (22:07)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Tom Lane (21:55)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Simon Riggs (21:34)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Simon Riggs (21:32)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Kenneth Marshall (15:49)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (14:48)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Kenneth Marshall (14:34)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (14:31)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Matthew Wakeling (14:29)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Kenneth Marshall (14:26)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Craig Ringer (14:05)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (14:03)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Ries van Twisk (13:29)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Kenneth Marshall (13:05)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Kenneth Marshall (12:59)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Richard Huxton (12:53)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (12:49)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (12:33)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Albe Laurenz (12:29)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Merlin Moncure (11:47)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Merlin Moncure (11:46)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Matthew Wakeling (09:36)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Richard Huxton (09:06)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Richard Huxton (08:54)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:51)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:33)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:33)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Chris (08:24)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Heikki Linnakangas (08:21)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (08:18)
  • Re: Any better plan for this query?.. Craig Ringer (08:12)
  • Any better plan for this query?.. Dimitri (07:42)
  • Re: Limit I/O bandwidth of a certain backend Greg Smith (05:11)
  • Re: Limit I/O bandwidth of a certain backend Bryan Murphy (00:55)
• 05 May 2009
  • Re: [HACKERS] high shared buffer and swap Matthew Wakeling (11:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] high shared buffer and swap Laurent Laborde (10:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] high shared buffer and swap PFC (09:09)
  • Limit I/O bandwidth of a certain backend Vlad Arkhipov (07:31)
• 04 May 2009
  • Re: high shared buffer and swap Scott Marlowe (15:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] high shared buffer and swap Martijn van Oosterhout (10:35)
  • Re: high shared buffer and swap Greg Stark (08:57)
  • high shared buffer and swap Laurent Laborde (08:15)
• 02 May 2009
  • Re: performance for high-volume log insertion Glenn Maynard (04:20)
  • Re: performance for high-volume log insertion david (01:04)
  • Re: performance for high-volume log insertion PFC (00:30)
• 01 May 2009
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Scott Carey (17:25)
  • Re: Many left outer joins with limit performance Tom Lane (16:14)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT James Nelson (15:42)
  • Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? Robert Haas (15:27)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT James Nelson (15:07)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT James Nelson (15:05)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT Tom Lane (14:57)
  • Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? henk de wit (14:32)
  • Many left outer joins with limit performance Gerhard Wiesinger (13:56)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (11:12)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (10:14)
  • Re: bad plan and LIMIT Adam Ruth (09:57)
  • bad plan and LIMIT James Nelson (08:15)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]