Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Home
About
Downloads
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Section Navigation
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
Subscribe
User lists
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-docs
pgsql-general
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
Developer lists
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
Community login
Profile
Lost password
Search archives
Advanced Search
pgsql-performance 2009-04 Thread Index (2/3)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:15:01 2012
420 messages
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Ognjen Blagojevic (Fri 10 10:20)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 18:07)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Fri 10 20:40)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Ognjen Blagojevic (Mon 13 13:23)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Justin Pitts (Mon 13 13:43)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Scott Marlowe (Mon 13 16:45)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Mon 13 19:14)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Rainer Mager (Sun 12 23:13)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Scott Marlowe (Sun 12 23:41)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Rainer Mager (Sun 12 23:49)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Scott Marlowe (Sun 12 23:58)
Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 06:43)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Tom Lane (Fri 10 13:50)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 17:07)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Tom Lane (Fri 10 17:19)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 17:46)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Lists (Thu 16 06:42)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Thu 16 08:12)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Merlin Moncure (Thu 16 12:06)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Tom Lane (Thu 16 15:37)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Tom Lane (Thu 16 15:43)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Lists (Thu 16 15:52)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Tom Lane (Thu 16 16:01)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Matthew Wakeling (Tue 14 09:39)
linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Mark Wong (Thu 09 14:01)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Kevin Grittner (Thu 09 14:10)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Thu 09 14:27)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Matthew Wakeling (Thu 09 14:32)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Thu 09 14:39)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Kevin Grittner (Thu 09 14:42)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (Thu 09 14:48)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Matthew Wakeling (Thu 09 14:47)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Kevin Grittner (Thu 09 14:40)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Scott Carey (Thu 09 22:50)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Albe Laurenz *EXTERN* (Fri 10 06:48)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Jeff (Mon 13 14:13)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Kevin Grittner (Mon 13 15:18)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Arjen van der Meijden (Thu 09 14:49)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Kevin Grittner (Thu 09 14:58)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Mark Wong (Thu 09 14:53)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning
Mark Wong (Thu 09 15:09)
Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Wed 08 21:09)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Віталій Тимчишин (Wed 08 21:30)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Wed 08 21:55)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Віталій Тимчишин (Thu 09 09:25)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Thu 09 23:42)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Greg Smith (Thu 09 23:59)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Merlin Moncure (Tue 14 13:46)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Heikki Linnakangas (Thu 09 11:29)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Thu 09 23:42)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Matthew Wakeling (Tue 14 09:33)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Tue 14 10:04)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Glenn Maynard (Fri 10 06:11)
Re: Nested query performance issue
Tom Lane (Fri 10 13:42)
bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6)
Marinos Yannikos (Wed 08 13:42)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6)
Marinos Yannikos (Wed 08 13:51)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6)
Tom Lane (Wed 08 14:28)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6)
Robert Haas (Wed 08 13:54)
determining the locks that will be held by a query
Brian Cox (Tue 07 18:06)
<Possible follow-ups>
determining the locks that will be held by a query
Brian Cox (Fri 10 19:05)
Re: determining the locks that will be held by a query
Kevin Grittner (Fri 10 20:02)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Mario Splivalo (Mon 06 12:21)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Scott Marlowe (Mon 06 14:03)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Mario Splivalo (Mon 06 14:38)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Scott Marlowe (Mon 06 14:47)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Mario Splivalo (Mon 06 14:51)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance
Scott Marlowe (Mon 06 15:23)
probelm with alter table add constraint......
roopasatish (Mon 06 07:10)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......
Robert Haas (Mon 06 10:43)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......
Albe Laurenz (Mon 06 10:47)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......
Tom Lane (Mon 06 13:54)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......
roopabenzer (Wed 22 07:16)
difficulties with time based queries
Rainer Mager (Sun 05 23:33)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
David Wilson (Sun 05 23:46)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Rainer Mager (Mon 06 01:25)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Tom Lane (Mon 06 01:33)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Rainer Mager (Mon 06 03:35)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Robert Haas (Mon 06 10:37)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Rainer Mager (Wed 08 22:49)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
PFC (Tue 14 09:19)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Nikolas Everett (Tue 14 16:00)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Rainer Mager (Fri 10 05:08)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Tom Lane (Fri 10 05:20)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Matthew Wakeling (Mon 06 12:24)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
PFC (Sun 05 23:56)
Re: difficulties with time based queries
Tom Lane (Mon 06 00:12)
Best replication solution?
Lists (Sun 05 18:36)
Message not available
Re: Best replication solution?
Lists (Sun 05 21:57)
Re: Best replication solution?
Greg Sabino Mullane (Mon 06 02:11)
Re: Best replication solution?
Heikki Linnakangas (Mon 06 08:27)
Re: Best replication solution?
Lists (Tue 07 03:44)
Re: Best replication solution?
Ivan Voras (Tue 07 10:11)
Re: Best replication solution?
Marinos Yannikos (Wed 08 11:45)
Re: Best replication solution?
Andrew Sullivan (Mon 06 12:41)
Re: Best replication solution?
Lists (Tue 07 04:06)
Re: Best replication solution?
Andrew Sullivan (Tue 07 16:21)
Re: Best replication solution?
Dimitri Fontaine (Tue 07 09:36)
Re: Best replication solution?
Mark Kirkwood (Tue 07 10:31)
Re: Best replication solution?
Andrew Sullivan (Tue 07 17:18)
Re: Best replication solution?
Mark Kirkwood (Wed 08 07:15)
Re: Best replication solution?
Jeff (Wed 08 19:20)
Re: Best replication solution?
Dimitri Fontaine (Wed 08 20:47)
Re: Best replication solution?
Jeff (Thu 09 12:19)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels
Greg Smith (Sat 04 16:08)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels
Josh Berkus (Sat 04 18:55)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels
Greg Smith (Sat 04 20:11)
Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Fri 03 23:13)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Sat 04 00:10)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Joshua D. Drake (Fri 10 16:00)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 17:15)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Laurent Laborde (Mon 27 15:33)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
henk de wit (Sat 04 10:00)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Jesper Krogh (Sat 04 10:49)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
henk de wit (Sat 04 15:54)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 05:41)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Mark Kirkwood (Fri 10 06:27)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 17:10)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Scott Carey (Fri 10 17:11)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Josh Berkus (Fri 10 17:31)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Scott Carey (Fri 10 17:40)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Greg Smith (Fri 10 18:01)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Scott Carey (Fri 10 18:17)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Greg Smith (Fri 10 19:25)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky (Sat 11 00:03)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Mark Wong (Sat 11 18:44)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Scott Carey (Sun 12 02:00)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Mark Wong (Mon 27 03:45)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns
Mark Wong (Mon 27 03:28)
Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Fri 03 19:53)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Tom Lane (Fri 03 20:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Fri 03 21:18)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Tom Lane (Fri 03 22:30)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Scott Marlowe (Fri 03 21:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Greg Smith (Fri 03 21:51)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Tom Lane (Fri 03 22:52)
Re: Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Fri 03 23:35)
Re: Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Fri 03 23:47)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Simon Riggs (Sun 05 07:01)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Tom Lane (Sun 05 15:47)
Re: Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Sun 05 17:12)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Tom Lane (Sun 05 17:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output
Greg Smith (Sat 04 02:36)
Re: Question on pgbench output
David Kerr (Sun 05 04:06)
plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 13:32)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Robert Haas (Fri 03 13:47)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 13:57)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 03 14:04)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 14:14)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 03 14:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 14:28)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 14:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 03 14:48)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 14:58)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Nathan Boley (Fri 03 19:03)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Simon Riggs (Fri 03 17:29)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Alvaro Herrera (Fri 03 17:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 03 17:39)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Mon 06 11:47)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Mon 06 12:52)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Robert Haas (Mon 06 14:36)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 03 14:08)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Tue 07 15:18)
Re: plpgsql arrays
justin (Tue 07 15:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Tue 07 15:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays
justin (Tue 07 15:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Tue 07 16:08)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Tue 07 16:22)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Merlin Moncure (Tue 07 19:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Tue 07 19:32)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Wed 08 10:35)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Tom Lane (Fri 10 17:57)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Merlin Moncure (Fri 03 15:02)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Merlin Moncure (Fri 03 15:09)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 15:15)
Re: plpgsql arrays
Merlin Moncure (Fri 03 15:18)
Rewriting using rules for performance
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 13:18)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance
Robert Haas (Fri 03 13:46)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance
Matthew Wakeling (Fri 03 13:55)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance
Merlin Moncure (Fri 03 15:52)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance
Merlin Moncure (Fri 03 15:59)
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group