Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
420 messages
14 April 2009
Re: INSERT times - same storage space but more fields -> much slower inserts Matthew Wakeling (16:01)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Nikolas Everett (16:00)
Re: INSERT times - same storage space but more fields -> much slower inserts Stephen Frost (15:57)
Re: Nested query performance issue Merlin Moncure (13:46)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (10:04)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Matthew Wakeling (09:39)
Re: Nested query performance issue Matthew Wakeling (09:33)
Re: difficulties with time based queries PFC (09:19)
INSERT times - same storage space but more fields -> much slower inserts Craig Ringer (07:57)
13 April 2009
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Scott Marlowe (16:45)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (15:18)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Jeff (14:13)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Justin Pitts (13:43)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Ognjen Blagojevic (13:23)
Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL Glyn Astill (11:49)
Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL Greg Smith (08:26)
12 April 2009
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Rainer Mager (23:49)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Scott Marlowe (23:41)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Rainer Mager (23:13)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (02:00)
11 April 2009
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns M. Edward (Ed) Borasky (00:03)
10 April 2009
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (20:40)
Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL Kevin Grittner (20:17)
2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL Glyn Astill (20:06)
Re: determining the locks that will be held by a query Kevin Grittner (20:02)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Greg Smith (19:25)
determining the locks that will be held by a query Brian Cox (19:05)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (18:17)
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Josh Berkus (18:07)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Greg Smith (18:01)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (17:57)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (17:46)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (17:40)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:31)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane (17:19)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:15)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (17:11)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:10)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (17:07)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Joshua D. Drake (16:00)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane (13:50)
Re: Nested query performance issue Tom Lane (13:42)
Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Ognjen Blagojevic (10:20)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Albe Laurenz *EXTERN* (06:48)
Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (06:43)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Mark Kirkwood (06:27)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (06:11)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (05:41)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (05:20)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (05:08)
09 April 2009
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (23:42)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (23:42)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Scott Carey (22:50)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (15:09)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:58)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (14:53)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Arjen van der Meijden (14:49)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:48)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Matthew Wakeling (14:47)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:42)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:40)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:39)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Matthew Wakeling (14:32)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:27)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:10)
linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (14:01)
Re: Best replication solution? Jeff (12:19)
Re: Nested query performance issue Heikki Linnakangas (11:29)
Re: Nested query performance issue Віталій Тимчишин (09:25)
08 April 2009
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (21:55)
Re: Nested query performance issue Віталій Тимчишин (21:30)
Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (21:09)
Re: Best replication solution? Dimitri Fontaine (20:47)
Re: Best replication solution? Jeff (19:20)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Tom Lane (14:28)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Robert Haas (13:54)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Marinos Yannikos (13:51)
bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Marinos Yannikos (13:42)
Re: Best replication solution? Marinos Yannikos (11:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (10:35)
Re: Best replication solution? Mark Kirkwood (07:15)
07 April 2009
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (19:32)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (19:24)
determining the locks that will be held by a query Brian Cox (18:06)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (17:18)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (16:22)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (16:21)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (16:08)
Re: plpgsql arrays justin (15:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays justin (15:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:18)
Re: Best replication solution? Mark Kirkwood (10:31)
Re: Best replication solution? Ivan Voras (10:11)
Re: Best replication solution? Dimitri Fontaine (09:36)
Re: Best replication solution? Lists (04:06)
Re: Best replication solution? Lists (03:44)
06 April 2009
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (14:51)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Scott Marlowe (14:47)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (14:38)
Re: plpgsql arrays Robert Haas (14:36)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Scott Marlowe (14:03)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Tom Lane (13:54)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (12:52)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (12:41)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Matthew Wakeling (12:24)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (12:21)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (11:47)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Albe Laurenz (10:47)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Robert Haas (10:43)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Robert Haas (10:37)
Re: Best replication solution? Heikki Linnakangas (08:27)
probelm with alter table add constraint...... roopasatish (07:10)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (03:35)
Re: Best replication solution? Greg Sabino Mullane (02:11)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (01:33)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (01:25)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (00:12)
05 April 2009
Re: difficulties with time based queries David Wilson (23:46)
difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (23:33)
Re: Best replication solution? Lists (21:57)
Best replication solution? Lists (18:36)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (17:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (17:12)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (15:47)
Re: Question on pgbench output Simon Riggs (07:01)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (04:06)
04 April 2009
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Josh Berkus (18:55)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Greg Smith (16:08)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns henk de wit (15:54)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Jesper Krogh (10:49)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns henk de wit (10:00)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (05:25)
Re: Question on pgbench output Greg Smith (02:36)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (02:26)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize david (01:05)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (00:10)
03 April 2009
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (23:35)
Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (23:13)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (22:52)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (22:30)
Re: Question on pgbench output Greg Smith (21:51)
Re: Question on pgbench output Scott Marlowe (21:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (21:18)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (20:43)
Question on pgbench output David Kerr (19:53)
Re: plpgsql arrays Nathan Boley (19:03)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (17:39)
Re: plpgsql arrays Alvaro Herrera (17:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays Simon Riggs (17:29)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Merlin Moncure (15:59)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Merlin Moncure (15:52)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:18)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:15)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:09)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:02)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:58)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:48)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:28)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:14)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:08)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:04)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (13:57)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Matthew Wakeling (13:55)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-performance 2009-04 Chronological Index (2/3)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:15:01 2012420 messages
- 15 April 2009
- Re: INSERT times - same storage space but more fields -> much slower inserts Craig Ringer (00:31)
- Re: INSERT times - same storage space but more fields -> much slower inserts Stephen Frost (16:17)
- Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (19:14)
- Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Scott Marlowe (23:58)
- Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Mark Wong (18:44)
- Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL Glyn Astill (22:00)
- Re: Nested query performance issue Greg Smith (23:59)
- Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (22:49)
- Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 Bruce Momjian (22:49)
- Re: difficulties with time based queries PFC (23:56)
- Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Greg Smith (20:11)
- Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (23:47)