Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Thats one of the thingsto be done in near future.
But it need some changes from application point of view. :( ... so just got escalated for that reason.
But for now, which one will be a well suited replication system ?
~ Gauri
--
Regards
Gauri
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Replication Syatem
- From: "Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Brad Nicholson" <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
- Cc: "Peter Childs" <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Replication Syatem
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:47:22 +0530
- Message-id: <7e4ba9550804280717w496ac1a0ic3c55ba664a48c9b(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
Thats one of the thingsto be done in near future.
But it need some changes from application point of view. :( ... so just got escalated for that reason.
But for now, which one will be a well suited replication system ?
~ Gauri
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> wrote:
You should seriously consider upgrading to PG 8.3. There have been
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 19:35 +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> Peter,
>
> We are doing vacuum full every alternate day. We also do vacuum
> analyze very often.
> We are currently using 8.1.3 version.
> Auto vacuum is already on. But the table1 is so busy that auto vacuum
> don't get sufficient chance to vacuum it :(.
substantial improvements to VACUUM since 8.1
Brad.
--
Regards
Gauri
- References:
- Replication Syatem
- From: Gauri Kanekar
- Re: Replication Syatem
- From: Peter Childs
- Re: Replication Syatem
- From: Gauri Kanekar
- Re: Replication Syatem
- From: Brad Nicholson
- Replication Syatem
- Prev by Date: Re: Replication Syatem
- Next by Date: Re: Replication Syatem
- Previous by thread: Re: Replication Syatem
- Next by thread: Re: Replication Syatem
- Indexes: