Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
pgsql-performance 2008-03 Chronological Index (2/3)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:16:11 2012
539 messages
- 17 March 2008
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (22:27)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Enrico Sirola (21:44)
-
Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Rich (18:52)
-
Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Rich (18:50)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (18:50)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (18:44)
-
Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Peter Koczan (18:29)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (18:29)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (18:29)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Dave Cramer (18:28)
-
Re: performance tools Ben Chobot (16:25)
-
Re: performance tools sathiya psql (15:59)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (15:45)
-
Re: performance tools Mark Steben (15:37)
-
performance tools sathiya psql (12:08)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig Ringer (10:47)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Andrej Ricnik-Bay (10:42)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Tino Wildenhain (10:37)
-
Re: Lots of "semop" calls under load Albe Laurenz (10:36)
-
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (06:41)
16 March 2008
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Dave Cramer (20:19)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (19:08)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (19:04)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Peter Eisentraut (18:11)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Dave Cramer (11:25)
Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Craig Ringer (06:25)
Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Craig James (06:20)
What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql Rich (06:12)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (05:20)
15 March 2008
Re: best way to run maintenance script Vinubalaji Gopal (04:07)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Vinubalaji Gopal (03:28)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Joshua D. Drake (02:17)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Tom Lane (01:37)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Vinubalaji Gopal (00:52)
Re: best way to run maintenance script Joshua D. Drake (00:32)
best way to run maintenance script Vinubalaji Gopal (00:25)
14 March 2008
Re: Anyone using a SAN? Peter Koczan (21:09)
Re: The "many nulls" problem Oleg Bartunov (20:30)
Re: The "many nulls" problem Kynn Jones (20:06)
Re: The "many nulls" problem Kynn Jones (20:05)
Re: The "many nulls" problem Heikki Linnakangas (19:46)
Re: Hardware question for a DB server Scott Marlowe (19:43)
Re: Hardware question for a DB server Pascal Cohen (19:24)
Re: The "many nulls" problem Oleg Bartunov (18:59)
The "many nulls" problem Kynn Jones (18:05)
Adaptec 5805 SAS Raid Glyn Astill (17:20)
Re: Lots of "semop" calls under load Tom Lane (16:34)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Michael Stone (16:17)
Lots of "semop" calls under load Albe Laurenz (13:50)
Re: ER diagram tool sathiya psql (11:35)
Re: ER diagram tool Jurgen Haan (10:26)
Re: 8.3 write performance Enrico Sirola (10:17)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (09:51)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Greg Smith (08:19)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin (07:32)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Jesper Krogh (06:35)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Jesper Krogh (06:29)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (06:23)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (06:19)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (06:12)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (06:09)
Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 Scott Marlowe (05:53)
Re: temp tables Tom Lane (00:01)
13 March 2008
temp tables James Mansion (22:17)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 justin (21:54)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Greg Smith (21:27)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Joshua D. Drake (21:06)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 justin (20:10)
Re: ER diagram tool Andrej Ricnik-Bay (19:43)
Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 Glyn Astill (16:10)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Greg Smith (16:02)
Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 Guillaume Smet (15:58)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (14:54)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (14:37)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (14:29)
Re: Repeated execution of identical subqueries Craig James (14:06)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin Graf (13:56)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Will Weaver (13:38)
Re: ER diagram tool A. Kretschmer (13:33)
ER diagram tool sathiya psql (13:24)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Doug Knight (12:39)
Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0 Glyn Astill (12:35)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Justin Graf (08:12)
Re: partial index + select query performance A. Kretschmer (07:34)
partial index + select query performance petchimuthu lingam (07:21)
Re: Repeated execution of identical subqueries Craig Ringer (06:35)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Joshua D. Drake (05:55)
Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Scott Marlowe (05:31)
Re: Repeated execution of identical subqueries Tom Lane (05:13)
Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 Craig James (04:55)
Repeated execution of identical subqueries Craig Ringer (03:38)
12 March 2008
Are piped columns indexable Mark Steben (20:38)
Re: Hardware question for a DB server Greg Smith (20:08)
Re: Hardware question for a DB server Pascal Cohen (19:49)
Re: Hardware question for a DB server Mark Lewis (19:26)
Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Bruce Momjian (19:16)
Hardware question for a DB server Pascal Cohen (18:58)
8.3 write performance Enrico Sirola (15:25)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Vivek Khera (14:46)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Steinar H. Gunderson (09:19)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (07:22)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Chris (07:08)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 david (06:57)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 david (06:50)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Craig Ringer (06:49)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 david (06:48)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (06:43)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Craig Ringer (06:37)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (06:36)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Craig Ringer (06:33)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Chris (06:31)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (06:29)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (06:24)
Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 Craig Ringer (05:33)
migration of 7.4 to 8.1 sathiya psql (05:27)
Re: list user created triggers sathiya psql (05:17)
Re: list user created triggers sathiya psql (04:07)
11 March 2008
Re: Joins and DELETE FROM Kynn Jones (15:57)
Re: count * performance issue Andrew Sullivan (14:35)
Re: count * performance issue Heikki Linnakangas (14:31)
Re: count * performance issue Matthew (14:18)
Re: count * performance issue Tino Wildenhain (14:02)
Re: count * performance issue Matthew (13:55)
Re: how many index can have???? Dave Cramer (13:47)
list user created triggers sathiya psql (13:38)
Re: count * performance issue Bill Moran (13:36)
how many index can have???? petchimuthu lingam (12:28)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan afterbulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Heikki Linnakangas (09:58)
Re: count * performance issue Albert Cervera Areny (08:41)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Pavan Deolasee (06:24)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Greg Smith (04:14)
Re: count * performance issue Scott Marlowe (03:11)
Re: count * performance issue Joshua D. Drake (03:08)
Re: count * performance issue Mark Mielke (03:02)
Re: count * performance issue Robins Tharakan (02:57)
Re: Nested loop vs merge join: inconsistencies between estimated and actual time Vlad Arkhipov (01:52)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Miguel Arroz (00:34)
10 March 2008
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Miguel Arroz (23:46)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Joshua D. Drake (23:22)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Miguel Arroz (23:18)
Re: count * performance issue Greg Smith (23:01)
Re: count * performance issue Scott Marlowe (22:28)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Simon Riggs (21:59)
Re: count * performance issue Greg Smith (21:52)
Re: count * performance issue Bill Moran (21:28)
Re: count * performance issue Joe Mirabal (20:54)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Rainer Pruy (17:16)
Re: multi-threaded pgloader needs your tests Dimitri Fontaine (16:08)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Tom Lane (15:20)
Re: count * performance issue Gregory Stark (15:16)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Craig Ringer (15:10)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Heikki Linnakangas (15:03)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Tom Lane (15:03)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Heikki Linnakangas (14:53)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Craig Ringer (14:49)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Tom Lane (14:34)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Craig Ringer (12:16)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Craig Ringer (11:29)
Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Heikki Linnakangas (11:01)
Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit Craig Ringer (09:56)
Utility functions for enabling/disabling fkey triggers Craig Ringer (09:31)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Greg Smith (05:10)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow Tom Lane (04:48)
Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow andrew (04:15)
UPDATE 66k rows too slow Miguel Arroz (02:28)
08 March 2008
Re: Joins and DELETE FROM Tom Lane (20:08)
Re: Joins and DELETE FROM Kynn Jones (19:02)
Re: Joins and DELETE FROM Heikki Linnakangas (18:02)
Joins and DELETE FROM Kynn Jones (17:31)
Re: Re: Confirma çã o de envio / Sending confirmation (captchaid:13266b402f09) Alvaro Herrera (14:18)
Re: count * performance issue Arjen van der Meijden (08:10)