Re: 12 disks raid setup
- From: Franck Routier <franck(dot)routier(at)axege(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: 12 disks raid setup
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:51:45 +0100
- Message-id: <1204296705.11773.51.camel@franck-gusty> <text/plain>
Hi,
my Raid controller is an Adaptec 31205 SAS/RAID controller. The battery
was an option, but I didn't know it at purchase time. So I have no
battery, but the whole system is on an UPS.
I have done quite a few tests using bonnie++, focusing on 'random seek'
results, and found out that:
1) linux md raid 10 performs better than Adaptec hardware raid in this
field (random seek) by 15%, quite consistently
2) hardware raid is better on sequential output
3) md outperforms it again when coming to sequential read, especially
with far layout option.
So in fact I think I will use md raid, but still don't know with which
layout (3x4 or 1x12).
What would you suggest as a benchmarking method ? Simply issue a few big
queries that I expect to be usual and see how long it last, or is there
a more convinient and or "scientific" method ?
Thanks,
Franck
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index