Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
- Cc: "Arjen van der Meijden" <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, "Christian Nicolaisen" <blackbrrd(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:06:49 +0100
> I missed the initial post in this thread, but I haven't seen any 15K rpm > 2.5" drives, so if you compare 10K rpm 2.5" drives with 15K rpm 3.5" > drives you will see differences (depending on your workload and controller > cache) I have some 15K rpm 2.5" sas-drives from HP. Other vendors have them as well. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
- References:
- 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- From: Christian Nicolaisen
- Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- From: Arjen van der Meijden
- Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- From: david
- 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- Prev by Date: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- Next by Date: Re: JDBC/Stored procedure performance issue
- Previous by thread: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- Next by thread: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
- Indexes: