Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Best way to index IP data?
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:07:38 -0500
Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> writes: > Well, a native IPv6 type would also be nice; inet is ridiculously > bloated for both IPv4 *and* IPv6. Nonsense. 3 bytes overhead on a 16-byte address is not "ridiculously bloated", especially if you want a netmask with it. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Michael Stone
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- References:
- Best way to index IP data?
- From: Kevin Kempter
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Steve Atkins
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Jonah H. Harris
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Pomarede Nicolas
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- From: Michael Stone
- Best way to index IP data?
- Prev by Date: Re: Evaluating boolean formula: slow performance
- Next by Date: Re: Best way to index IP data?
- Previous by thread: Re: Best way to index IP data?
- Next by thread: Re: Best way to index IP data?
- Indexes: