Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
- To: pgsql-performance Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:26:58 -0500
On Dec 26, 2007, at 4:28 PM, david(at)lang(dot)hm wrote:
now, if you can afford solid-state drives which don't have noticable seek times, things are completely different ;-)
Who makes one with "infinite" lifetime? The only ones I know of are built using RAM and have disk drive backup with internal monitoring are *really* expensive.
I've pondered building a raid enclosure using these new SATA flash drives, but that would be an expensive brick after a short period as one of my DB servers...
- References:
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: Fernando Hevia
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: david
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Prev by Date: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Next by Date: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
- Previous by thread: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Next by thread: Anyone running on RHEL Cluster?
- Indexes: