Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
- To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
- Cc: Fernando Hevia <fhevia(at)ip-tel(dot)com(dot)ar>, "'Mark Mielke'" <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, "'pgsql-performance'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:55:38 +0100
> seek/read/calculate/seek/write since the drive moves on after the > read), when you read you must read _all_ drives in the set to check > the data integrity. I don't know of any RAID implementation that performs consistency checking on each read operation. 8-(
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: Mark Mielke
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: david
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- References:
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: Fernando Hevia
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- From: david
- Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Prev by Date: Re: pg_dump performance
- Next by Date: Re: pg_dump performance
- Previous by thread: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Next by thread: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Indexes: