Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com> writes:
> Is there any particular reason not to ensure that any low-level
> threading support in libc is enabled right
> from the get-go, as a build-time option?
Yes.
1) It's of no value to us
2) On many platforms there is a nonzero performance penalty
regards, tom lane
- References:
- libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
- Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index