• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2007-11 Thread Index (1/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance cluster (Fri 30 11:18)
• Re: Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance Matthew (Fri 30 13:30)
• Re: Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance Bill Moran (Fri 30 14:20)
• Re: Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance cluster (Fri 30 16:18)
• clear pg_stats Campbell, Lance (Thu 29 21:46)
• Re: clear pg_stats Heikki Linnakangas (Thu 29 21:58)
• Re: clear pg_stats Magnus Hagander (Thu 29 22:00)
• Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alex Hochberger (Thu 29 18:28)
• Re: Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Richard Huxton (Thu 29 19:15)
• Re: Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alex Hochberger (Thu 29 19:21)
• Re: Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alvaro Herrera (Thu 29 19:29)
• Re: Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Josh Berkus (Fri 30 05:50)
• 7.4 Checkpoint Question Brad Nicholson (Thu 29 15:10)
• Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question Andrew Sullivan (Thu 29 16:03)
• Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question Simon Riggs (Thu 29 16:14)
• Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question Brad Nicholson (Thu 29 16:18)
• Optimizer regression 8.2.1 -> 8.2.3 on TSEARCH2 queries with ORDER BY and LIMIT Brendan McMahon (Wed 28 15:30)
• Windows XP selects are very slow Shadkam Islam (Wed 28 09:31)
• Re: Windows XP selects are very slow Richard Huxton (Wed 28 12:28)
• Re: Windows XP selects are very slow Usama Munir Dar (Wed 28 16:15)
• GiST indexing tuples Matthew (Tue 27 18:28)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 27 18:39)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Matthew (Wed 28 13:08)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Gregory Stark (Wed 28 13:36)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Tom Lane (Wed 28 15:34)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Matthew (Wed 28 16:10)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Matthew T. O'Connor (Thu 29 20:22)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Steinar H. Gunderson (Thu 29 20:30)
• Re: GiST indexing tuples Matthew (Fri 30 13:45)
• Query only slow on first run cluster (Tue 27 16:47)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Andrew Sullivan (Tue 27 16:55)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Tom Lane (Tue 27 17:26)
• Re: Query only slow on first run cluster (Tue 27 18:47)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Bill Moran (Tue 27 18:56)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher (Tue 27 19:04)
• Re: Query only slow on first run cluster (Tue 27 23:17)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 27 23:38)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Tom Lane (Wed 28 00:26)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson (Wed 28 00:28)
• Re: Query only slow on first run tmp (Wed 28 11:06)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Craig James (Wed 28 14:56)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher (Wed 28 16:00)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Tom Lane (Wed 28 17:12)
• Re: Query only slow on first run cluster (Wed 28 20:17)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson (Wed 28 20:35)
• Re: Query only slow on first run cluster (Wed 28 21:17)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Jean-David Beyer (Wed 28 22:03)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Tom Lane (Wed 28 22:24)
• Re: Query only slow on first run cluster (Thu 29 11:18)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Tom Lane (Thu 29 15:32)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Scott Marlowe (Thu 29 06:49)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher (Tue 27 23:47)
• Re: Query only slow on first run Kevin Kempter (Tue 27 16:57)
• 8.1 planner problem ? Gianluca Alberici (Tue 27 07:21)
• Re: 8.1 planner problem ? Heikki Linnakangas (Tue 27 10:13)
• PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart (Mon 26 22:50)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Alexander Staubo (Mon 26 23:00)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Scott Marlowe (Mon 26 23:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Scott Marlowe (Mon 26 23:01)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart (Mon 26 23:40)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Tom Lane (Mon 26 23:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart (Mon 26 23:41)
• Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Greg Smith (Tue 27 00:57)
• Base de Datos Transaccional Fabio Arias (Mon 26 20:22)
• Re: Base de Datos Transaccional Peter T. Breuer (Mon 26 20:36)
• Re: Base de Datos Transaccional Pablo Alcaraz (Mon 26 20:53)
• TB-sized databases Peter Koczan (Mon 26 17:04)
• Re: TB-sized databases Joshua D. Drake (Mon 26 17:23)
• Re: TB-sized databases Oleg Bartunov (Mon 26 17:34)
• Re: TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz (Mon 26 18:44)
• Re: TB-sized databases Stephen Cook (Mon 26 19:16)
• Re: TB-sized databases Peter Koczan (Tue 27 20:19)
• Re: TB-sized databases Simon Riggs (Tue 27 20:57)
• Re: TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz (Tue 27 23:06)
• Re: TB-sized databases Matthew (Wed 28 12:54)
• Re: TB-sized databases Bill Moran (Wed 28 13:27)
• Re: TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy (Wed 28 13:48)
• Re: TB-sized databases Bill Moran (Wed 28 13:54)
• Re: TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy (Wed 28 14:04)
• Re: TB-sized databases david (Wed 28 13:57)
• Re: TB-sized databases Simon Riggs (Wed 28 17:23)
• Re: TB-sized databases Matthew (Wed 28 17:34)
• Re: TB-sized databases david (Wed 28 20:49)
• Re: TB-sized databases Gregory Stark (Thu 29 12:00)
• Re: TB-sized databases Tom Lane (Thu 29 15:46)
• Re: TB-sized databases Simon Riggs (Thu 29 16:14)
• Re: TB-sized databases Stephen Frost (Thu 29 16:43)
• Re: TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy (Thu 29 16:54)
• Re: TB-sized databases Trevor Talbot (Fri 30 10:15)
• Re: TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy (Fri 30 10:29)
• Re: TB-sized databases Mark Kirkwood (Thu 29 23:31)
• Re: TB-sized databases Gregory Stark (Wed 28 13:55)
• Re: TB-sized databases Bill Moran (Wed 28 13:59)
• Re: TB-sized databases Matthew (Wed 28 14:41)
• Re: TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz (Wed 28 14:15)
• Re: TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz (Wed 28 14:57)
• Re: TB-sized databases Alvaro Herrera (Wed 28 15:12)
• Re: TB-sized databases Simon Riggs (Wed 28 17:28)
• Re: TB-sized databases Russell Smith (Fri 30 06:42)
• Re: TB-sized databases Simon Riggs (Fri 30 08:40)
• Re: TB-sized databases Luke Lonergan (Fri 30 15:45)
• doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Pablo Alcaraz (Sun 25 16:46)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Heikki Linnakangas (Sun 25 18:18)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Erik Jones (Sun 25 18:21)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Peter Childs (Sun 25 19:15)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Tom Lane (Sun 25 19:35)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Pablo Alcaraz (Sun 25 22:37)
• Re: doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Peter Childs (Mon 26 10:41)
• Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia . amorim (Fri 23 23:21)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Heikki Linnakangas (Sat 24 08:53)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia . amorim (Sat 24 12:00)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia . amorim (Sun 25 04:57)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Scott Marlowe (Sun 25 06:26)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia . amorim (Sun 25 12:42)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Scott Marlowe (Sun 25 14:33)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia . amorim (Sun 25 16:19)
• Re: Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Heikki Linnakangas (Mon 26 09:39)
• Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Dean Rasheed (Fri 23 13:29)
• Re: Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Jeff Larsen (Fri 23 16:29)
• Re: Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Tom Lane (Fri 23 17:42)
• Re: Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Dean Rasheed (Sat 24 12:06)
• tuning for TPC-C benchmark giuseppe-r(at)tiscali(dot)it (Thu 22 14:10)
• Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark Bill Moran (Thu 22 14:33)
• Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark Jonah H. Harris (Thu 22 14:59)
• Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark Heikki Linnakangas (Thu 22 19:22)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark Kevin Grittner (Thu 22 15:45)
• Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark Jonah H. Harris (Thu 22 17:38)
• Postgres ignoring index when using left outer join. Matthew Schumacher (Wed 21 04:14)
• Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict func tions)‏ Dean Rasheed (Sun 18 10:34)
• Re: Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)‏ Tom Lane (Sun 18 18:28)
• RE: Performance problem (outer join + view + n on-strict functions)‏ Dean Rasheed (Sun 18 22:14)
• autovacuum: recommended? Gábor Farkas (Fri 16 09:40)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? hubert depesz lubaczewski (Fri 16 09:45)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? gabor (Sun 18 19:26)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! (Mon 19 08:02)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Jean-David Beyer (Mon 19 13:39)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Bill Moran (Mon 19 13:51)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Jean-David Beyer (Mon 19 15:47)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Joshua D. Drake (Mon 19 17:19)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Greg Smith (Mon 19 17:23)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Tobias Brox (Fri 16 11:14)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Csaba Nagy (Fri 16 11:56)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! (Mon 19 08:04)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? tv (Fri 16 13:35)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Tobias Brox (Sun 18 19:01)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! (Mon 19 08:03)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? tv (Mon 19 09:49)
• Re: autovacuum: recommended? Tom Lane (Mon 19 15:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Bruce Momjian (Thu 15 20:49)
• random_page_cost etc. per tablespace? Jens-Wolfhard Schicke (Tue 13 10:24)
• ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Stephane Bailliez (Mon 12 19:58)
• Re: ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Tom Lane (Mon 12 22:54)
• Re: ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Stephane Bailliez (Tue 13 15:07)
• difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer (Mon 12 14:51)
• Re: difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Alvaro Herrera (Mon 12 14:59)
• Re: difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer (Mon 12 15:13)
• Re: difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Tom Lane (Mon 12 16:38)
• Re: difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer (Mon 12 18:32)
• Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) adrobj (Mon 12 06:59)
• Re: Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Heikki Linnakangas (Fri 16 19:33)
• Re: Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Jeff Davis (Fri 16 19:34)
• Re: Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Bill Moran (Fri 16 19:51)
• Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Sat 10 16:27)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Tom Lane (Sat 10 17:08)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Sat 10 18:38)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Joshua D. Drake (Sat 10 18:50)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Sat 10 19:57)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Scott Marlowe (Sun 11 02:11)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Sun 11 02:23)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan (Mon 12 16:32)
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan (Tue 13 15:21)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Tue 13 19:51)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan (Tue 13 21:35)
• Message not available
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan (Tue 13 22:10)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer (Tue 13 23:09)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera (Tue 13 23:51)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Trevor Talbot (Tue 13 23:59)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera (Wed 14 00:04)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Wed 14 00:11)
• Re: Curious about dead rows. Merlin Moncure (Wed 14 00:28)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc