Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Vacuum goes worse
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>
- Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:30:31 -0400
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?= <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> writes: > Tom Lane a écrit : >> The real question is how often do rows get updated? I suspect you >> probably need to vacuum this table more than once a day. > To be honest, I suspect it too. But, I have been told by people using > that database they can't do vacuum more frequently than once in a day as > it increases the time to achieve concurrent operations. vacuum_cost_delay can help here. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Vacuum goes worse
- From: Stéphane Schildknecht
- Re: Vacuum goes worse
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Vacuum goes worse
- From: Stéphane Schildknecht
- Vacuum goes worse
- Prev by Date: Re: Vacuum goes worse
- Next by Date: Re: Autovacuum running out of memory
- Previous by thread: Re: Vacuum goes worse
- Next by thread: Re: Vacuum goes worse
- Indexes: