Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:24:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708311923060.3790@westnet.com> <text/plain>
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
If he gets it done soon (before the HOT dust settles) I will be strongly tempted to try to sneak it into 8.3 ...
Could you or Florian suggest how other people might assist in meeting that goal? It seems like something worthwhile but it's not clear to me how to add manpower to it usefully.
-- * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- References:
- 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Pallav Kalva
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Pallav Kalva
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Mikko Partio
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- From: Tom Lane
- 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy)
- Previous by thread: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Next by thread: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
- Indexes: