Pallav Kalva wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Probably represents freezing of old tuples, which is a WAL-logged
operation as of 8.2. Is it likely that the data is 200M transactions
old?
If nothing changed on these tables how can it freeze old tuples ?
Does it mean that once it reaches 200M transactions it will do the same
thing all over again ?
No -- once tuples are frozen, they don't need freezing again (unless
they are modified by UPDATE or DELETE).
If I am doing just SELECTS on these tables ? how can there be any
transactions ? or SELECTS considered transactions too ?
Selects are transactions too. They just don't modify data.