Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Vacuum looping?
- From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
- To: Steven Flatt <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Vacuum looping?
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:36:24 -0500
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:32:11PM -0400, Steven Flatt wrote: > weren't convinced was doing anything), then start a manual vacuum with a > higher vacuum_cost_limit to get things cleaned up quicker. What are your vacuum_cost_* settings? If you set those too aggressively you'll be in big trouble. The second pass on the vacuum means that maintenance_work_memory isn't large enough. -- Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Attachment:
pgpTGeuaSi9Ud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vacuum looping?
- From: Steven Flatt
- Re: Vacuum looping?
- References:
- Vacuum looping?
- From: Steven Flatt
- Vacuum looping?
- Prev by Date: Re: Vacuum looping?
- Next by Date: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
- Previous by thread: Re: Vacuum looping?
- Next by thread: Re: Vacuum looping?
- Indexes: