Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
- Cc: PostgreSQL List Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:03:31 -0700
Jim,
Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL. On that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT. I think SpecJ would show a greater difference, but we're still focussed on benchmarks we can publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.
--Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- From: Jim Nasby
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- References:
- 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- From: Jim Nasby
- 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple query showing 270 hours of CPU time
- Next by Date: Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?
- Previous by thread: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- Next by thread: Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
- Indexes: