Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
- To: "Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:22:36 +0100
Craig A. James wrote:
Since we're only aggregating information, we have no control over the data that these companies provide.
And at the end of the day that's the root of the problem. It's easy to be lulled into "well it looks like a primary key" rather than being able to guarantee it.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Greg Smith
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- References:
- Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Kynn Jones
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Bill Moran
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Craig A. James
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Greg Smith
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- From: Craig A. James
- Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Prev by Date: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Next by Date: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Next by thread: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
- Indexes: