• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-cygwin
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-interfaces
    • pgsql-jdbc
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-odbc
    • pgsql -performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-ports
    • pgsql-sql
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Project lists
  • User groups
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• In The Real World
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News

pgsql-performance 2007-04 Chronological Index (2/3)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 April 2007
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Merlin Moncure
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Greg Smith
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Richard Huxton
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Craig A. James
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Craig A. James
• 17 April 2007
  • Help with TOAST Compression David Hinkle
  • Re: FK triggers misused? cluster
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Merlin Moncure
  • Re: Fwd: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Fwd: Strangely Variable Query Performance Robins
  • Fwd: Strangely Variable Query Performance Robins Tharakan
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Greg Smith
• 16 April 2007
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Tom Lane
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Tom Lane
  • Re: FK triggers misused? cluster
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Ron Mayer
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Merlin Moncure
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Craig A. James
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Merlin Moncure
• 15 April 2007
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Andrew - Supernews
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Tom Lane
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Andrew - Supernews
  • Re: FK triggers misused? Tom Lane
• 14 April 2007
  • Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance) Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance) Tom Lane
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance) Tom Lane
  • FK triggers misused? cluster
  • Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Bill Moran
  • Basic Q on superfluous primary keys Kynn Jones
  • Re: Finding bloated indexes? Simon Riggs
• 13 April 2007
  • Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance) Alvaro Herrera
  • choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance) Tom Lane
  • Re: Finding bloated indexes? Vivek Khera
  • Re: Please humor me ... Simon Riggs
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Jan de Visser
  • Finding bloated indexes? Dan Harris
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Ron
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Steve
  • Re: local selectivity estimation - computing frequency of predicates Tom Lane
  • local selectivity estimation - computing frequency of predicates Avdhoot Kishore Saple
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Andrew McMillan
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Greg Smith
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
• 12 April 2007
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Guido Neitzer
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Jason Lustig
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance Tom Lane
  • Strangely Variable Query Performance Steve
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Equivalents in PostgreSQL of MySQL's "ENGINE=MEMORY" "MAX_ROWS=1000" Robert Treat
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Jeff Frost
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Steve
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Jeff Frost
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Guido Neitzer
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Ron
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Guido Neitzer
  • Re: Large objetcs performance Merlin Moncure
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Ron
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Jeff Frost
  • Re: Slow Postgresql server Dennis Bjorklund
  • Re: Question about memory allocations Tom Lane
  • Slow Postgresql server Jason Lustig
  • Question about memory allocations Steve
  • Re: Beginner Question Jan de Visser
• 11 April 2007
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Michael Dengler
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Devrim GÜNDÜZ
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Adam Rich
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Michael Dengler
• 10 April 2007
  • Long running transactions again ... Tobias Brox
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Devrim GÜNDÜZ
  • Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Guillaume Smet
  • Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3 Michael Dengler
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Tom Lane
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Merlin Moncure
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Tom Lane
  • Re: DELETE with filter on ctid Tom Lane
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Tom Lane
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Drew Wilson
  • Re: Beginner Question Dave Dutcher
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Tom Lane
  • Re: DELETE with filter on ctid Spiegelberg, Greg
  • Re: DELETE with filter on ctid Spiegelberg, Greg
  • Re: Beginner Question Mike Gargano
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Merlin Moncure
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Drew Wilson
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Tom Lane
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Drew Wilson
  • Re: Beginner Question s d
• 09 April 2007
  • Re: DELETE with filter on ctid Craig A. James
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Tom Lane
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Merlin Moncure
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Merlin Moncure
  • Re: how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Merlin Moncure
  • Re: join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Tom Lane
  • Re: Please humor me ... Jeff Davis
  • Re: DELETE with filter on ctid Tom Lane
  • how to efficiently update tuple in many-to-many relationship? Drew Wilson
  • Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Alex Deucher
  • Please humor me ... Carlos Moreno
  • DELETE with filter on ctid Spiegelberg, Greg
  • Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Alex Deucher
  • join to view over custom aggregate seems like it should be faster Merlin Moncure
  • Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Alex Deucher
  • Re: Beginner Question Tom Lane
  • Beginner Question s d
• 08 April 2007
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA James Mansion
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA mark
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA david
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
• 07 April 2007
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA david
  • Re: fast DISTINCT or EXIST Arjen van der Meijden
  • Re: fast DISTINCT or EXIST Tom Lane
  • Re: fast DISTINCT or EXIST Tilo Buschmann
  • Re: fast DISTINCT or EXIST Tom Lane
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: fast DISTINCT or EXIST Arjen van der Meijden
  • fast DISTINCT or EXIST Tilo Buschmann
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Bruce Momjian
• 06 April 2007
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Mark Kirkwood
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Andreas Kostyrka
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA david
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Charles Sprickman
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA david
  • Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Alex Deucher
  • Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Michael Fuhr
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Michael Stone
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Greg Smith
  • postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan Alex Deucher
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Jonathan Ellis
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Tom Lane
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Michael Stone
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Jonathan Ellis
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Tom Lane
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Jonathan Ellis
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Tom Lane
  • Re: more on high load on postgres 7.4.16 Geoffrey
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: more on high load on postgres 7.4.16 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
  • more on high load on postgres 7.4.16 Geoffrey
  • Re: High Load on Postgres 7.4.16 Server John Allgood
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Scott Marlowe
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Jonathan Ellis
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Michael Stone
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Geoffrey
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Geoffrey
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Ron
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Michael Stone
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Michael Stone
  • Re: SCSI vs SATA Tom Lane
  • Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? Tom Lane

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]