Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: pg_trgm performance
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: pg_trgm performance
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:58:34 +0100
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:16:36AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Am I missing something? Or are trigrams just a poor match for my data > set? Are the individual strings too long, maybe? FWIW, I've seen the same results with 8.1.x. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
- References:
- pg_trgm performance
- From: Florian Weimer
- pg_trgm performance
- Prev by Date: Re: max() versus order/limit (WAS: High update
- Next by Date: Re: max() versus order/limit (WAS: High update
- Previous by thread: pg_trgm performance
- Next by thread: FiberChannel cards for FreeBSD on AMD64
- Indexes: