Re: Scaling concerns
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: tsuraan <tsuraan(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Scaling concerns
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:59:12 -0500
- Message-id: <21940.1166417952@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
tsuraan <tsuraan(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is the WAL at the same location as the xlog (transaction log?)?
Same thing.
> The checkpoint_segments doc says increasing that value is really only
> useful if the xlog is separate from the data,
Dunno where you read that, but it's utter bilge. If you've got a
write-intensive workload, you want to crank checkpoint_segments as high
as you can stand. With the default settings on a modern machine it's
not hard at all to push it into checkpointing every dozen or seconds,
which will completely kill performance. (Disk space for pg_xlog/ and
potential delay during crash restart are the only negatives here. If
you are willing to push the average inter-checkpoint interval past five
minutes then you need to increase checkpoint_timeout too.)
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index