Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- From: "Mindaugas" <mind(at)bi(dot)lt>
- To: "Arjen van der Meijden" <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>
- Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:05:24 +0200
- Message-id: <01b701c719ef$9e73b610$f20214ac(at)bite(dot)lt>
These benchmarks are all done using 64 bit linux: http://tweakers.net/reviews/646
I see. Thanks.Now about 2 core vs 4 core Woodcrest. For HP DL360 I see similarly priced dual core 5160(at)3GHz and four core E5320(at)1(dot)86Ghz(dot) According to article's scaling data PostgreSQL performance should be similar (1.86GHz * 2 * 80% = ~3GHz). And quad core has slightly slower FSB (1066 vs 1333).
So it looks like more likely dual core 5160 Woodrest is the way to go if I want "ultimate" performance on two sockets?
Besides that I think it should consume a bit less power!? Mindaugas
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- From: Arjen van der Meijden
- Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- References:
- Core 2 or Opteron
- From: Mindaugas
- Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- From: Arjen van der Meijden
- Core 2 or Opteron
- Prev by Date: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- Next by Date: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- Previous by thread: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- Next by thread: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
- Indexes: