• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-performance 2006-10 Thread Index (3/4)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: Hints proposal, (continued)
  • Re: Hints proposal Mark Kirkwood (Mon 16 20:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (Fri 13 22:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (Fri 13 23:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Alvaro Herrera (Sat 14 01:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Tom Lane (Sat 14 04:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Gregory Stark (Fri 13 16:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Robert Treat (Wed 18 02:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD (Fri 13 09:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (Fri 13 22:58)
  • Re: Hints proposal Craig A. James (Sun 15 23:58)
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Andrew Sullivan (Thu 12 19:04)
  • Re: Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (Thu 12 16:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (Thu 12 16:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (Thu 12 17:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Tom Lane (Thu 12 17:18)
  • Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (Thu 12 16:43)
  • Re: Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (Thu 12 17:21)
  • Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (Thu 12 19:08)
  • Re: Hints proposal Arjen van der Meijden (Thu 12 21:07)
  • Re: Hints proposal Tom Lane (Thu 12 21:29)
  • Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (Thu 12 22:15)
  • Re: Hints proposal Richard Broersma Jr (Thu 12 21:41)
  • Re: Hints proposal Christopher Browne (Fri 13 02:55)
  • Re: Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (Thu 12 19:34)
  • Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (Thu 12 22:41)
• Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (Tue 10 21:44)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (Tue 10 22:14)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (Tue 10 22:37)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (Tue 10 22:47)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (Tue 10 23:46)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Jim C. Nasby (Wed 11 01:03)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (Wed 11 02:50)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (Wed 11 16:54)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Jim C. Nasby (Wed 11 20:53)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (Thu 12 18:05)
• Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (Thu 12 18:25)
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Re: Scrub one large table against another (vmstat output) Brendan Curran (Wed 11 17:25)
        • Re: Scrub one large table against another (vmstat output) Markus Schaber (Thu 12 06:55)
• long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 16:10)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 16:23)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 16:39)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 16:41)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 16:42)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 17:06)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 17:09)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 17:13)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 17:18)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 17:50)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 18:05)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 18:20)
• Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (Tue 10 18:27)
• Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (Tue 10 18:44)
• Postgre 8.0 Installation - Issues Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai. (Tue 10 11:07)
• Re: Postgre 8.0 Installation - Issues Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 14:16)
• odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (Mon 09 18:22)
• Re: odd variances in count(*) times Stephen Frost (Mon 09 18:30)
• Re: odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (Mon 09 18:41)
• Re: odd variances in count(*) times Steinar H. Gunderson (Mon 09 18:45)
• Re: odd variances in count(*) times Jim C. Nasby (Mon 09 21:24)
• Re: odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (Tue 10 06:30)
• autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer (Mon 09 14:02)
• Re: autovacuum not working? Bill Moran (Mon 09 14:11)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer (Mon 09 14:27)
• Re: autovacuum not working? Jim C. Nasby (Mon 09 21:26)
• Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (Sat 07 06:36)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Sat 07 15:51)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Denis Lussier (Sun 08 01:50)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim Nasby (Sun 08 17:17)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (Mon 09 01:03)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (Mon 09 01:09)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Mon 09 02:41)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (Mon 09 02:48)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Mon 09 03:38)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Mon 09 04:44)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (Mon 09 17:12)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Mon 09 17:42)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne (Mon 09 19:04)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Mon 09 21:18)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Mon 09 22:40)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Wed 11 00:35)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Wed 11 00:37)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Mon 09 01:14)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne (Mon 09 03:10)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Scott Marlowe (Mon 09 20:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruce Momjian (Mon 09 02:12)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (Mon 09 02:45)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tobias Brox (Mon 09 21:33)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Mon 09 22:30)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (Mon 09 22:41)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 14:02)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (Tue 10 14:23)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Mon 09 22:45)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 14:00)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Tue 10 14:15)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 14:21)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (Tue 10 17:27)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 19:26)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruno Wolff III (Tue 10 16:34)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (Tue 10 01:17)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (Tue 10 03:18)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (Tue 10 03:22)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Tue 10 14:07)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 10 14:16)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (Tue 10 14:25)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (Tue 10 14:24)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (Wed 11 01:22)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Wed 11 02:38)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (Wed 11 03:58)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bucky Jordan (Wed 11 14:27)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Heikki Linnakangas (Wed 11 14:51)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruce Momjian (Wed 11 14:53)
• Collect stats during seqscan (was: Simple join optimized badly?) Jim C. Nasby (Wed 11 20:28)
• Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Lewis (Wed 11 15:07)
• FW: Simple join optimized badly? H.J. Sanders (Thu 12 07:50)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Thu 12 09:59)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Thu 12 13:53)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (Thu 12 14:44)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (Thu 12 16:37)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Thu 12 22:26)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Scott Marlowe (Thu 12 18:00)
• Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (Thu 12 22:07)
• pg_trgm indexes giving bad estimations? Ben (Thu 05 01:35)
• Re: pg_trgm indexes giving bad estimations? Tom Lane (Thu 05 01:55)
• Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tobias Brox (Wed 04 18:13)
• Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Graham Davis (Wed 04 18:25)
• Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tom Lane (Wed 04 20:34)
• Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tobias Brox (Wed 04 20:41)
• UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (Wed 04 18:01)
• Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 me (Wed 04 18:14)
• Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (Thu 05 05:07)
• Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Tom Lane (Thu 05 13:20)
• Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Tom Lane (Wed 04 20:28)
• Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (Thu 05 04:56)
• Re: slow queue-like empty table Tobias Brox (Wed 04 10:59)
• Re: slow queue-like empty table Jim Nasby (Fri 06 05:26)
• simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 07:48)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Heikki Linnakangas (Wed 04 09:11)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 09:19)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Richard Huxton (Wed 04 09:50)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 09:40)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Richard Huxton (Wed 04 10:36)
• Message not available
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Richard Huxton (Wed 04 13:45)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 13:48)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Richard Huxton (Wed 04 14:05)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 14:46)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux simon godden (Wed 04 14:49)
• Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux Dave Dutcher (Wed 04 14:12)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 18:41)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Chris Browne (Tue 03 19:04)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 19:12)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Chris Browne (Tue 03 20:04)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 20:34)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Tom Lane (Tue 03 20:48)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 20:54)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Mark Lewis (Tue 03 21:07)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 21:25)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Mark Lewis (Tue 03 21:34)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 21:37)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Mark Lewis (Tue 03 21:54)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Tom Lane (Tue 03 22:39)
• PostgreSQL Caching Adnan DURSUN (Tue 03 21:49)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Tomeh, Husam (Tue 03 22:11)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Adnan DURSUN (Tue 03 23:53)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Tomeh, Husam (Wed 04 01:29)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Adnan DURSUN (Wed 04 02:24)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Dave Dutcher (Wed 04 12:38)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Brad Nicholson (Wed 04 13:47)
• Re: PostgreSQL Caching Brad Nicholson (Wed 04 13:52)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Graham Davis (Tue 03 19:15)
• Re: BUG #2658: Query not using index Bruno Wolff III (Tue 03 20:38)
• Poor performance on very simple query ? Arnaud Lesauvage (Tue 03 11:54)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Steinar H. Gunderson (Tue 03 12:01)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Arnaud Lesauvage (Tue 03 12:04)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Alexander Staubo (Tue 03 12:08)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Darcy Buskermolen (Tue 03 15:35)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Tobias Brox (Tue 03 12:10)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Tobias Brox (Tue 03 12:11)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Arnaud Lesauvage (Tue 03 12:14)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Tobias Brox (Tue 03 12:17)
• Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Arnaud Lesauvage (Tue 03 12:25)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc