Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: partitioned table performance
- From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: "Andreas Kostyrka" <andreas(at)kostyrka(dot)org>
- Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:18:21 +0000
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Kostyrka wrote: > Any ideas how to make the optimizer handle partitioned tables more > sensible? Yes, those are known inefficiencies in the current implementation which we expect to address for 8.3. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: partitioned table performance
- From: Andreas Kostyrka
- Re: partitioned table performance
- References:
- partitioned table performance
- From: Andreas Kostyrka
- partitioned table performance
- Prev by Date: Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes
- Next by Date: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0
- Previous by thread: partitioned table performance
- Next by thread: Re: partitioned table performance
- Indexes: