Re: Best COPY Performance
- From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
- To: Worky Workerson <worky(dot)workerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: "Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Best COPY Performance
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:28:13 -0500
- Message-id: <20061025152812.GQ26892@nasby.net> <text/plain>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:03:38AM -0400, Worky Workerson wrote:
> I'm just doing CSV style transformations (and calling a lot of
> functions along the way), but the end result is a straight bulk load
> of data into a blank database. And we've established that Postgres
> can do *way* better than what I am seeing, so its not suprising that
> perl is using 100% of a CPU.
If you're loading into an empty database, there's a number of tricks
that will help you:
Turn off fsync
Add constraints and indexes *after* you've loaded the data (best to add
as much of them as possible on a per-table basis right after the table
is loaded so that it's hopefully still in cache)
Crank up maintenance_work_mem, especially for tables that won't fit into
cache anyway
Bump up checkpoint segments and wal_buffers.
Disable PITR
Create a table and load it's data in a single transaction (8.2 will
avoid writing any WAL data if you do this and PITR is turned off)
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index