Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
- Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:39:17 -0700
>> > ODBC is often blamed for this sort of thing - I have the 8.01.02
>> release
>> > dated 2006.01.31. Everything appears to be at its default setting.
>>
>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
I should note that we need to get a build out for Windows for rev 80.
Rev 80 is the one the build showing the most promise on Linux32 and 64
bit. It is also the one that reflects the performance metrics we have
been seeing.
We should have that in a week or so.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
- References:
- Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Carlo Stonebanks
- Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Is ODBC that slow?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Next by Date: Re: VACUUM Performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Next by thread: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Indexes: