Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
- Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:40:12 -0700
>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be >> consistently faster than psqlODBC. >> >> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng > > just curious: what was the reasoning to reimplement the protocol stack > in odbcng? the mainline odbc driver went in the other direction. We wanted to be able to offer some options that we couldn't if based around libpq. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > carlo: please, please, get your mail server to quit telling me your > mailbox is full :) > > merlin > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
- References:
- Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Carlo Stonebanks
- Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Is ODBC that slow?
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow functional indexes?
- Next by Date: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Next by thread: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
- Indexes: