Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
641 messages
14 October 2006
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Tom Lane (04:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Alvaro Herrera (01:29)
13 October 2006
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (22:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (22:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Bucky Jordan (17:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Gregory Stark (16:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Tom Lane (16:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (16:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD (09:08)
Re: Hints proposal Christopher Browne (02:55)
12 October 2006
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (22:26)
Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (22:15)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (22:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Alvaro Herrera (22:03)
Re: Hints proposal Richard Broersma Jr (21:41)
Re: Hints proposal Tom Lane (21:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Bucky Jordan (21:19)
Re: Hints proposal Arjen van der Meijden (21:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (20:57)
Re: Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (19:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (19:24)
Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (19:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Andrew Sullivan (19:04)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (18:25)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (18:05)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Scott Marlowe (18:00)
Re: Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (17:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Tom Lane (17:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (17:05)
Re: Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (16:53)
Re: Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (16:46)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (16:46)
Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (16:43)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Josh Berkus (16:41)
Re: Hints proposal Bucky Jordan (16:40)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (16:37)
Re: Hints proposal Csaba Nagy (16:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (16:25)
Re: Hints proposal Tom Lane (16:24)
Re: Hints proposal Merlin Moncure (16:22)
Re: Hints proposal Heikki Linnakangas (15:55)
Re: Hints proposal Tom Lane (15:42)
Re: Hints proposal Joshua Marsh (15:26)
Re: Hints proposal Bruce Momjian (15:19)
Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (15:14)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (14:44)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (13:53)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (09:59)
FW: Simple join optimized badly? H.J. Sanders (07:50)
Re: Scrub one large table against another (vmstat output) Markus Schaber (06:55)
11 October 2006
Collect stats during seqscan (was: Simple join optimized badly?) Jim C. Nasby (20:28)
Re: Scrub one large table against another (vmstat output) Brendan Curran (17:25)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (16:54)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Lewis (15:07)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruce Momjian (14:53)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Heikki Linnakangas (14:51)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bucky Jordan (14:27)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (03:58)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (02:50)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (02:38)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (01:22)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Jim C. Nasby (01:03)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (00:37)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (00:35)
10 October 2006
Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (22:47)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (22:37)
Re: Scrub one large table against another Tom Lane (22:14)
Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (21:44)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (19:26)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (18:44)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (18:27)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (18:20)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (18:05)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (17:50)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (17:27)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (17:18)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (17:13)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (17:09)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (17:06)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (16:42)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (16:41)
Re: long running transactions Tobias Brox (16:39)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruno Wolff III (16:34)
Re: long running transactions Tom Lane (16:23)
long running transactions Tobias Brox (16:10)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (14:25)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (14:24)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (14:23)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (14:21)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Steinar H. Gunderson (14:16)
Re: Postgre 8.0 Installation - Issues Jim C. Nasby (14:16)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (14:15)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (14:07)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (14:02)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (14:00)
Postgre 8.0 Installation - Issues Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai. (11:07)
Re: odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (06:30)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (03:22)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (03:18)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Brian Herlihy (01:17)
09 October 2006
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake (22:41)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (22:40)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (22:30)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tobias Brox (21:33)
Re: autovacuum not working? Jim C. Nasby (21:26)
Re: odd variances in count(*) times Jim C. Nasby (21:24)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby (21:18)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Scott Marlowe (20:31)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne (19:04)
Re: odd variances in count(*) times Steinar H. Gunderson (18:45)
Re: odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (18:41)
Re: odd variances in count(*) times Stephen Frost (18:30)
odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure (18:22)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (17:42)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (17:12)
Re: autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer (14:27)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (14:19)
Re: autovacuum not working? Bill Moran (14:11)
autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer (14:02)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (13:49)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (04:44)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (03:38)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne (03:10)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Jim C. Nasby (03:06)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Jim C. Nasby (03:03)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (02:48)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (02:45)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood (02:41)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruce Momjian (02:12)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (01:14)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (01:09)
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus (01:03)
08 October 2006
Re: Simple join optimized badly? Denis Lussier (01:50)
07 October 2006
Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James (06:36)
06 October 2006
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (19:17)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Scott Marlowe (16:53)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (16:42)
Re: slow queue-like empty table Jim Nasby (05:26)
Re: Unsubscribe Jim Nasby (05:26)
Re: Unsubscribe Jim Nasby (05:25)
Re: Unsubscribe Jim Nasby (05:25)
Re: any hope for my big query? Jim Nasby (05:24)
05 October 2006
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Tom Lane (16:35)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (16:28)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (13:30)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Tom Lane (13:24)
Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Tom Lane (13:20)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (07:32)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (06:26)
Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (05:07)
Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (04:56)
Re: pg_trgm indexes giving bad estimations? Tom Lane (01:55)
pg_trgm indexes giving bad estimations? Ben (01:35)
04 October 2006
Re: any hope for my big query? Ben (21:42)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure (21:07)
Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tobias Brox (20:41)
Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tom Lane (20:34)
Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Tom Lane (20:28)
Re: Unsubscribe Michael Stone (19:19)
Re: Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Graham Davis (18:25)
Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (18:23)
Re: UPDATE becomes mired / win32 me (18:14)
Multi-key index not beeing used - bug? Tobias Brox (18:13)
UPDATE becomes mired / win32 Steve Peterson (18:01)
Re: Poor performance on very simple query ? Markus Schaber (17:10)
Re: Unsubscribe Geoffrey (16:48)
Re: Unsubscribe Steve Atkins (16:46)
Re: Unsubscribe Csaba Nagy (16:35)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-performance 2006-10 Chronological Index (3/4)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:18:07 2012641 messages
- 15 October 2006
- Re: [ADMIN] autovacuum on a -mostly- r/o table Tobias Brox (09:53)
- Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Mischa Sandberg (21:47)
- Re: [HACKERS] Hints proposal Jim C. Nasby (23:36)
- Re: Hints proposal Jeff Davis (22:41)
- Re: Scrub one large table against another Jim C. Nasby (20:53)
- Re: Scrub one large table against another Brendan Curran (23:46)
- Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (22:45)
- Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim Nasby (17:17)
- Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane (15:51)
- Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (20:45)
- Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (17:45)
- Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Carlo Stonebanks (22:41)