Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
641 messages
31 October 2006
Re: Help w/speeding up range queries? Luke Lonergan (23:55)
Help w/speeding up range queries? John Major (23:47)
Re: MVCC & indexes? Alvaro Herrera (22:36)
MVCC & indexes? Ivan Voras (22:24)
Re: Best COPY Performance Teemu Torma (21:43)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Rob Lemley (21:17)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (21:14)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (20:56)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (20:45)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (20:23)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (20:16)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (20:11)
Re: Index ignored on column containing mostly 0 values Andreas Kostyrka (15:02)
Re: client crashes in PQfinish Richard Huxton (11:48)
Re: client crashes in PQfinish soni de (05:59)
Re: Index ignored on column containing mostly 0 values Tom Lane (04:40)
Re: Index ignored on column containing mostly 0 values Michael Glaesemann (04:31)
Index ignored on column containing mostly 0 values Leif Mortenson (04:21)
30 October 2006
Re: partitioned table performance Andreas Kostyrka (21:57)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Bucky Jordan (16:39)
Re: Best COPY Performance Stefan Kaltenbrunner (16:22)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (16:07)
Re: Best COPY Performance Stefan Kaltenbrunner (15:56)
Re: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Steinar H. Gunderson (15:51)
Re: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Mattias Kregert (15:40)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (15:23)
Re: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Tom Lane (15:09)
Re: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Mattias Kregert (14:28)
Re: Best COPY Performance Spiegelberg, Greg (14:09)
Re: Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Steinar H. Gunderson (12:28)
Strange plan in pg 8.1.0 Mattias Kregert (11:56)
Re: partitioned table performance Simon Riggs (08:19)
29 October 2006
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andrew Sullivan (16:43)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andreas Kostyrka (16:23)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andrew Sullivan (15:34)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (15:10)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andrew Sullivan (14:58)
28 October 2006
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Merlin Moncure (17:40)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (15:51)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (15:45)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (15:42)
Re: Best COPY Performance Michael Artz (12:03)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Simon Riggs (10:08)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (04:08)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (03:47)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (03:43)
Re: Best COPY Performance Merlin Moncure (03:12)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (01:01)
27 October 2006
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (19:37)
Re: Best COPY Performance Merlin Moncure (19:02)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (18:40)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Tom Lane (18:07)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Scott Marlowe (15:49)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Thomas Burdairon (15:09)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk Lutzebäck (14:53)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Alexander Staubo (14:48)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Bricklen Anderson (14:34)
Re: query produces 1 GB temp file Merlin Moncure (13:52)
Re: Regarding Bitmap Scan soni de (13:12)
client crashes in PQfinish soni de (13:09)
query produces 1 GB temp file Dirk Lutzebaeck (11:46)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (09:20)
Index ignored with "is not distinct from", 8.2 beta2 JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER (02:20)
Re: query slows down drastically with increased number of Tom Darci (00:01)
26 October 2006
Re: query slows down drastically with increased number of fields Jim C. Nasby (22:37)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andrew Sullivan (22:09)
Re: query slows down drastically with increased number of fields George Pavlov (22:04)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Jim C. Nasby (22:00)
Re: query slows down drastically with increased number of fields Tom Lane (21:53)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (20:55)
Re: Stored procedure slower than sql? Jim C. Nasby (19:20)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Jim C. Nasby (19:17)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Jim C. Nasby (19:08)
Re: OT: TCL vs Perl Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Joshua D. Drake (18:31)
OT: TCL vs Perl Re: commit so slow program looks frozen mark (18:07)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (17:49)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Richard Troy (17:46)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Richard Troy (17:21)
Re: Stored procedure slower than sql? Matthew Peters (16:53)
Re: Stored procedure slower than sql? Tom Lane (16:46)
Stored procedure slower than sql? Matthew Peters (15:49)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (15:07)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Merlin Moncure (15:06)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (14:48)
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Tom Lane (14:47)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (14:43)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Rocco Altier (12:00)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Magnus Hagander (11:49)
VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (09:22)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Jim C. Nasby (04:22)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (03:35)
25 October 2006
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Scott Marlowe (22:05)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Joshua D. Drake (21:42)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Mark Lonsdale (21:31)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Joshua D. Drake (21:17)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Richard Huxton (21:12)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Mark Lonsdale (20:57)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Brian Hurt (20:52)
Re: Configuration Issue ? Joshua D. Drake (20:51)
Configuration Issue ? Mark Lonsdale (20:48)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (20:32)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (20:13)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (20:08)
Re: Best COPY Performance Markus Schaber (18:59)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (18:27)
Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Alvaro Herrera (18:23)
Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock Atesz (17:41)
Re: Best COPY Performance Craig A. James (17:29)
query slows down drastically with increased number of fields Tom Darci (17:26)
Re: Best COPY Performance Spiegelberg, Greg (17:25)
Re: Best COPY Performance Craig A. James (16:53)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (16:34)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (16:26)
commit so slow program looks frozen Carlo Stonebanks (15:46)
Re: Best COPY Performance Merlin Moncure (15:38)
Re: Problems using a function in a where clause Jim C. Nasby (15:32)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (15:28)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (15:22)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (15:07)
Re: Best COPY Performance Merlin Moncure (13:20)
Re: Best COPY Performance Markus Schaber (12:22)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (12:10)
Re: Best COPY Performance Alex Stapleton (11:16)
Re: Best COPY Performance Craig A. James (05:37)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (00:33)
Re: Copy database performance issue Jim C. Nasby (00:25)
Re: Problems using a function in a where clause Jim C. Nasby (00:21)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (00:17)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (00:15)
24 October 2006
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (20:11)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Bucky Jordan (13:57)
Re: Copy database performance issue Jignesh Shah (13:31)
Re: Index on two columns not used Markus Schaber (09:29)
Re: Slow functional indexes? Stuart Bishop (07:01)
23 October 2006
Re: Best COPY Performance Craig A. James (22:38)
Copy database performance issue Steve (22:13)
Re: Best COPY Performance Joshua D. Drake (22:10)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Jim C. Nasby (22:08)
Re: Best COPY Performance Jim C. Nasby (21:59)
Re: New hardware thoughts Jim C. Nasby (21:47)
Re: Vacuum and Memory Loss Jim C. Nasby (21:36)
Re: New hardware thoughts Joshua D. Drake (21:33)
Re: New hardware thoughts Vivek Khera (21:31)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Joshua D. Drake (21:11)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Vivek Khera (21:09)
Re: New hardware thoughts Joshua D. Drake (21:08)
Re: New hardware thoughts Vivek Khera (21:03)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Joshua D. Drake (20:58)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Vivek Khera (20:56)
Re: New hardware thoughts Bucky Jordan (20:28)
Problems using a function in a where clause Mara Dalponte (19:54)
Re: Index on two columns not used Tom Lane (16:01)
Re: Best COPY Performance Worky Workerson (15:38)
Re: Index on two columns not used Markus Schaber (15:17)
Re: Best COPY Performance Luke Lonergan (15:11)
Re: Index on two columns not used Alvaro Herrera (13:51)
Re: Index on two columns not used Markus Schaber (13:26)
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron John Philips (12:17)
Re: Best COPY Performance Markus Schaber (09:27)
Re: Vacuum and Memory Loss Richard Huxton (08:45)
Re: New hardware thoughts Arjen van der Meijden (07:33)
Re: New hardware thoughts Joshua D. Drake (03:02)
22 October 2006
Re: pgBench on Windows Harald Armin Massa (21:56)
Re: Vacuum and Memory Loss Dave Dutcher (21:32)
Re: New hardware thoughts Bucky Jordan (19:31)
Re: Jdbc/postgres performance Dave Cramer (15:11)
21 October 2006
Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Joshua D. Drake (19:01)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-performance 2006-10 Chronological Index (1/4)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 04:18:07 2012641 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 01 November 2006
- Re: MVCC & indexes? mark (00:20)
- Re: Help w/speeding up range queries? Luke Lonergan (00:11)
- Re: Help w/speeding up range queries? Weslee Bilodeau (23:57)
- Re: partitioned table performance Simon Riggs (22:47)
- Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Andreas Kostyrka (17:14)
- partitioned table performance Andreas Kostyrka (22:26)
- Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes Gavin Hamill (22:19)
- Re: query slows down drastically with increased number of fields Tom Lane (22:50)
- Re: commit so slow program looks frozen Joshua D. Drake (22:11)
- Re: Is ODBC that slow? Carlo Stonebanks (21:49)
- Re: Index on two columns not used Péter Kovács (23:07)
- Re: New hardware thoughts Arjen van der Meijden (22:12)
- Re: Optimizing disk throughput on quad Opteron Ben Suffolk (19:32)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]