Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:28:18 -0400
Cedric Boudin <cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com> writes: > So the question is: is there a correlation between not getting the wal's > archived and this "massive" load growth? Shouldn't be. Do you want to force the condition again and try to see *where* the cycles are going? "High load factor" alone is a singularly useless report. Also, how many unarchived WAL files were there? regards, tom lane
- References:
- archive wal's failure and load increase.
- From: Cedric Boudin
- archive wal's failure and load increase.
- Prev by Date: Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies
- Next by Date: any hope for my big query?
- Previous by thread: archive wal's failure and load increase.
- Next by thread: Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.
- Indexes: