Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
- To: "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:23:31 -0700
Markus, On 9/20/06 11:02 AM, "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> wrote: > I thought that posix_fadvise() with POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED was exactly > meant for this purpose? This is a good idea - I wasn't aware that this was possible. We'll do some testing and see if it works as advertised on Linux and Solaris. - Luke
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- From: Markus Schaber
- Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- References:
- Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- From: Markus Schaber
- Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- Prev by Date: Re: running benchmark test on a 50GB database
- Next by Date: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- Previous by thread: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- Next by thread: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
- Indexes: