Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:08:43 +0200
- Message-id: <20060917000843(dot)GA16058(at)uio(dot)no>
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote: > Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're > talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB. Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- References:
- Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- From: Bucky Jordan
- Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- From: Luke Lonergan
- Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Prev by Date: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Next by Date: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Previous by thread: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Next by thread: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
- Indexes: